The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Consensus is that the topic meets the general notability guidelines, but needs clean-up. The title is incomplete since the reliable source material call it Mid Europa Partners. I tagged the article for clean-up and moved the article to Mid Europa Partners to better assist others to locate the article and improve it.-- Jreferee t/c 19:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mid Europa[edit]

Mid Europa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article does not assert that it meets WP:CORP. Also has WP:V and WP:RS issues. Vegaswikian 03:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The Wikipedist 04:46, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep A quick Google search reports back over 66,000 hits. The article looks decently well-written, just needs some sources. GlassCobra (Review) 02:48, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Exactly how does it meet WP:CORP, WP:V and WP:RS? Vegaswikian 02:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep these mostly look like reliable sources... lots of news coverage. --W.marsh 16:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.