The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Now if you will excuse me I have to go sterilize the finger I used to push the "keep" button. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Metapedia (white nationalist encyclopedia)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable racist encyclopedia. Previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metapedia . Metapedia was eventually made a protected redirect because of repeated attempts at creating a new Metapedia article. Speedy delete was declined because article is substantially different from past versions. Clinchfield (talk) 18:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; deleting due to racist nature of the subject wiki smacks of IDONTLIKEIT. Tisane (talk) 19:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
We keep lots of odd stuff around here. It needs some better sourcing, but it's not awful. Bearian (talk) 22:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep The sourcs in the article seem to imply a level of notability (or perhaps notoriety). Them From Space 03:05, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I'm not going to say that this article is in the best of shape, but I don't see any given valid reason to delete. If we're going to indiscriminately delete racist subjects, why not delete Adolf Hitler or Ku Klux Klan. The main reason to delete something is a lack of notability, and if the Southern Poverty Law Center (one of the most trusted authorities on racism) thinks it's notable enough to do a write-up on this, I think it's notable enough for Wikipedia. Kansan (talk) 14:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A notable encyclopedia and content in English and 11 other European languages werldwayd (talk) 21:52, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.