The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article about a neighbourhood within a city, not properly referenced as passing WP:GEOLAND. The rule for populated places is basically that the city itself is inherently notable, while the individual neighbourhoods within the city get their own standalone articles only if they can be well-referenced to enough reliable source coverage to properly establish that they actually have any standalone notability independent of the city. But of the three "references" that were here before I initiated this discussion, all were garbage that had to be struck: one was a circular reference to another Wikipedia article, and the other two were both badly formatted (in completely different ways) links to the same self-published website of a school in the neighbourhood -- which means zero of them were to reliable or notability-supporting sources at all. Bearcat (talk) 23:16, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.