The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Contested or not, a speedy is a speedy. Punkmorten 21:13, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mason Turner[edit]

Mason Turner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

First a contested speedy... then a contested prod... so now it washes up here. Patent vanity page with no legitimate assertion of notability whatsoever (although full marks for the attempt to puff it up into something that looks like more than the sum of its parts). — iridescent (talk to me!) 21:00, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete still a db-bio regardless of how much purple prose the author writes. JuJube 21:05, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.