The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 09:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MECWA[edit]

Unsourced article about a local charity. Speedied once as copyvio, this version seems clean on that score. No evidence presented that this has been the primary focus of multiple non-trivial coverage in reliable secondary sources, author has few other contributions. Guy (Help!) 16:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, additional sources have now been added,including references from local and state-based governments. Hootville 00:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete - no evidence of notability; no external sources except their own website, so there's no proof of independent external coverage. Delete unless further sources are added. Walton monarchist89 18:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per additional sources added. Walton monarchist89 18:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Quarl ^(talk) 05:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I added some references. --Eastmain 05:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Current set of references appear sufficient. JavaTenor 09:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per notability additions above ThePurpleMonkey_{(talk•portal•contribs)} 18:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Eastmain 21:01, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, they have a decent impact on society with a long history and $20mil/yr of services provided to the community. John Vandenberg 00:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per recent changes and history of notable contributions to their community. RFerreira 07:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.