< 26 March 28 March >
Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 06:04, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Tic Tok Men[edit]

The Tic Tok Men (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:BAND. All references on the main page are from the personal websites of the band. There are additional (outdated/rotted) links on the articles talk page, but none are from non-trivial, published works. I cannot find additional information on the band through my own research. Mbdfar (talk) 00:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. As regards this mass nomination - individual renominations are recommended. Sandstein 08:30, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Climate change (disambiguation)[edit]

Climate change (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Honestly, these disambiguation pages are pretty useless and have been defunct for a long time. They should be hatnotes on the primary topic and not disambiguation pages. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 22:44, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Simon (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Afton, New York (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
België (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Belgique (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Breukelen (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Cantona (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Coentrão (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Football League (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
George Heriot (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Stephen Darby (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's okay either way, but since the dab pages exist, why do extra work? Clarityfiend (talk) 06:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Clarityfiend, Because there is an apparent primary topic, why create a disambiguation page just to show two links? It's just a lot easier to have a hatnote than have a disambiguation page which wastes space on the encyclopedia per WP:HATCHEAP. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 17:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nominator withdrawal due to forgetting about WP:ANYBIO. However, the article definitely needs work. (non-admin closure) Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 21:28, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

William James Broughton[edit]

William James Broughton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biographical article has only one source, which makes verifiability difficult, and has no claim of notability - which means the article fails WP:NBIO. My WP:BEFORE check failed to bring up anything of note besides passing mentions. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 22:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 22:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 22:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Rathfelder (talk) 18:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suzette Davenport[edit]

Suzette Davenport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim of notability. Rathfelder (talk) 22:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 22:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:29, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:45, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. YorkshireLad  ✿  (talk) 17:40, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  21:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rebecca Gwynne[edit]

Rebecca Gwynne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable BLP, inappropriately using only IMDb as as a source for many years Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:16, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:19, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  21:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Johnston (director)[edit]

Jim Johnston (director) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable director. No evidence of secondary sources available. Inappropriately sourced for several years with no signs of potential for improvement Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:52, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:52, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 20:52, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:18, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TAXI (A&R)[edit]

TAXI (A&R) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not meet WP:NCORP: another one of those self-described "world's leading" something-or-others. I started to fix references, but it's a stale article full of half-dead URLs, so I'm nominating for discussion to determine if anyone else can track down real WP:CORPDEPTH, or if it should just be deleted. Closeapple (talk) 20:14, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Closeapple (talk) 20:14, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Closeapple (talk) 20:14, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Closeapple (talk) 20:14, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Closeapple (talk) 20:14, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FoodMayhem[edit]

FoodMayhem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable - trivial mentions. Was no consensus in 2008 when standards were much lower. Boleyn (talk) 18:18, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:11, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:11, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  22:00, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Debasis Laha[edit]

Debasis Laha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

0 sources about anyone under this name, keeps being recreated so off to AFD we go. Praxidicae (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:45, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:45, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Storobin[edit]

David Storobin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a State elected official who served for 11 days of legislative session and less than a year in office in a district that was eliminated. Not a noteworthy individual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.97.104.30 (talk) 16:28, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk 18:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk 18:22, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:24, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suzanne McConnell[edit]

Suzanne McConnell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not meeting the notability criteria. The book mentioned doesn't have any significant coverage and the subject fails WP:AUTHOR as well. - The9Man (Talk) 18:08, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 19:30, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete many of these sources are blogs. Graywalls (talk) 04:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Deadmau5 discography#Compilation albums. Will also be protected against recreation. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:22, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For Lack of a Better Album Title[edit]

For Lack of a Better Album Title (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage can be found on this specific album. All sources used on this article are all about For Lack of a Better Name. Fails WP:NALBUM. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:57, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:57, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:59, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:59, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Michig: the redirect may need to be protected if that's the case, because the editor has repeatedly moved it back. Richard3120 (talk) 15:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  22:00, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tiffany Claus[edit]

Tiffany Claus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 17:49, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:56, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:56, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:56, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:57, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:57, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui  22:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kohsantepheap Daily[edit]

Kohsantepheap Daily (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insubstantial coverage; Has ((Unreferenced)) tag since 2014 - no changes; nn per WP:NCORP Flori4nKT A L K 17:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Flori4nKT A L K 17:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Flori4nKT A L K 17:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  22:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toni Carr[edit]

Toni Carr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet any aspect of WP:NOTABILITY. Considered a redirct to Naptown Roller Girls but there is no information in that article about her. Boleyn (talk) 17:35, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:03, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:14, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  22:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bola tangkas[edit]

Bola tangkas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to read about this in the original language, but I couldn't establish that this is notable. No article in other language Wikipedias, no sources. Previous AfD was in 2008 (when standards were much lwoer) but showed up a lot of confusion over the term. Boleyn (talk) 17:26, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:04, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:06, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Leaving aside issues of COI, this is a valid nomination, but the consensus clearly concludes that the subject meets Wikipedia's inclusion requirements, and we therefore ought to have an article about him. Yunshui  22:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

William A. Tomasso[edit]

William A. Tomasso (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hello, I'm submitting a request to delete this pseudo-biography about a low-profile individual per WP:BLP1E, on behalf of Mr. Tomasso. I've reviewed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, completed the checks recommended here, and followed the deletion instructions to the best of my ability. I've reviewed the article's sourcing in detail. Of the nine citations, two do not mention the subject at all (References #2 and #5), two mention the subject in passing (References #1 and #7), and two are official websites of non-notable organizations confirming board roles (References #8 and #9). I don't believe any of the sources would be considered in-depth profiles about the subject.

As for potential sources, searching "William Tomasso" at Google News yields just 4 results: the first actually focuses on Angelo Tomasso Jr.; the second is just a quote by the subject as president of TBI Construction; the third mentions the subject in passing; and the fourth is not about the subject whatsoever. Searching "William A. Tomasso" and "Billy Tomasso" at Google News yield additional results, but after browsing the first several pages of returns, I'm not seeing any coverage specifically about the subject. I should also note, some of the information in the "Career" section already appears in the Tomasso Group's "Modern history" section.

I think most editors would agree there's not enough press coverage of William Tomasso to meet Wikipedia's notability threshold and justify a standalone article. There's not enough coverage to flesh out the page with details about his early life and education, career, personal life, and notable accomplishments, which seem to be the building blocks of a Wikipedia biography. Any details about Mr. Tomasso could easily be covered in Tomasso Group.

Thanks to editors who are willing to review this request. SHtom5916 (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
By legal case do you mean the criminal trial which ended in his conviction? There are two legal cases currently discussed on the page, one civil (the alleged stalking/harassment of a former employee and their family) and one criminal (racketeering, fraud, bribery, extortion, etc). Horse Eye Jack (talk) 17:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also [2] appears to be a feature article specifically about “Bill” Tomasso. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 17:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Judy Baldwin[edit]

Judy Baldwin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable filmmaker. Directed commercials and music videos for unnamed groups. The article says she was nominated for a DGA award, but I'm not finding her OR the company, AT&T, with a nomination that year or surrounding years, so I think whoever wrote this was mistaken. I have done WP:BEFORE in Proquest newspapers, NewspaperArchive, and Newspapers.com. Can't even find an obit or article from 2010 or an external link to add (no IMDb!) that isn't a mirror site.The article was created by a user with a username that is the same name as a person mentioned in the article as someone she was supposed to work with before her untimely death, so there is a potential COI issue. I would have WP:PRODed, but I'm hoping someone will find something, anything, in an attempt to save the article. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 16:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 16:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 13:54, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jasper Batey[edit]

Jasper Batey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The player does not meet the notability guidelines laid out in Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues. He did not make an appearance in a Football League match during his career and as such does not appear in Joyce's Football League Players' Records 1888 to 1939. The appearances listed for Brighton & Hove Albion were made in the Southern League. Beatpoet (talk) 14:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:06, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  22:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rudolph Ingram[edit]

Rudolph Ingram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E and general protection of minors. An article on a 7 or 8-year old whose achievements are heavily promoted by his father and then in turn doubted by the media is not the kind of thing we should have her, even if there are some sources about it. Fram (talk) 14:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 14:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 14:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  22:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toronto Real Estate Board[edit]

Toronto Real Estate Board (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local (not even national or provincial) industry group of real estate agents. no independent coverage or other indication of notability. Despite the word "Board" in its title, it is not a government agency. The article is mostly used as a vehicle to promote the organization and needs to be constantly policed to remove hype and unsupported claims. TJRC (talk) 21:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:18, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:18, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui  07:44, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 13:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui  09:49, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nikita Dragun[edit]

Nikita Dragun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly non-notable youtuber with unreliable sources presents. 103.103.98.170 (talk) 04:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Nomination on behalf of IP Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:51, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:51, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:52, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:52, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:53, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  22:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MP3 Rocket[edit]

MP3 Rocket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A defunct media download service (or filesharing service plugin), which has negligible coverage in reliable sources and no real evidence that it was ever notable. I can't see "significant coverage" as required by WP:GNG.

Note that this was nominated at AfD in 2014, which did not address the matter of notability - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MP3 Rocket Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 10:56, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:03, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Fenix down (talk) 07:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gerard Zaragoza[edit]

Gerard Zaragoza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article lacks references King Onyx (talk) 10:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:59, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:59, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:00, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:15, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  22:05, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Scottish Pipe Band[edit]

Washington Scottish Pipe Band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long-standing but don't see sufficient coverage to meet GNG. Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 09:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 09:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 09:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:22, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:21, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Sachdeva[edit]

Bobby Sachdeva (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not meeting the notability criteria. The references mentioned are either PR or passing mentions. The claimed book page is coming as not reachable and fails WP:AUTHOR - The9Man (Talk) 07:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. - The9Man (Talk) 07:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. - The9Man (Talk) 07:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Baseball in Australia. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:13, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Schools Championship (baseball)[edit]

Australian Schools Championship (baseball) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 06:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Franciscan spirituality in Protestantism. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:15, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Saint Francis[edit]

Order of Saint Francis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD; has no visible verifiable references from reliable sources; messy; questionable notability; and multiple COIs.   — Jeff G. ツ 06:52, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.   — Jeff G. ツ 06:52, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of ATK players. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:14, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of ATK (football club) players[edit]

List of ATK (football club) players (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Duplicate article of two years old List of ATK players, no point in maintaining two articles.- Akhiljaxxn (talk) 05:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:29, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deleting the page is indeed not an option, as it would create a copyright (attribution) problem. Redirect seems best to me, because List of ATK players is a more suitable title, and that way we can keep the attribution. --MrClog (talk) 16:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@MrClog and Dey subrata:; SHISHIR DUA made his first edit on the page List of ATK players back in 2019. Which means he was well aware of the existence of that page. And there is no need to create a new page for the same subject in the very next year.– Akhiljaxxn (talk) 17:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Akhiljaxxn: That's why we want to turn it into a redirect. That way, the legally required attribution still exists. --MrClog (talk) 17:37, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have redirected it once, but he restored it.– Akhiljaxxn (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SHISHIR DUA can you explain the above mentioned edit, otherwise it looks a wastage of time for all here. Dey subrata (talk) 18:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Dey subrata the redirect seems to have been done without any consensus so this line of inquiry seems moot. Thepenguin9 (talk) 19:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Thepenguin9: the redirect was actully based on the proposel of him.– Akhiljaxxn (talk) 03:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You misinterpreted his request. He was requesting that your article be merged into his, due to the Proposed Deletion template he used, (unfortunately Merge to is the right one) Thepenguin9 (talk) 09:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus seems to be that this formation of the topic is not notable. Noting in case of future recreations, there might be related or similar topics which are notable. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:10, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic Initiative (Italy)[edit]

Democratic Initiative (Italy) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Politically irrelevant federation, the only information concerns its foundation. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 18:31, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • nuke this one
  • expand it with it:Iniziativa democratica
  • have two articles, Democratic Initiative (1taly, 1951) , Democratic Initiative (1taly, 2008)
Staszek Lem (talk) 21:48, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I propose to rewrite the page entirely, changing the current object with that of the Italian page (the faction of Christian Democracy). --Scia Della Cometa (talk) 23:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:01, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still in active discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 04:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Notability seems to hinge for keep voters on his fame and his being a recipient of the Taraggi medal. The claim of fame has not been substantiated by sources and editors favoring delete suggest that the Taraggi medal is too common to convey notability. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Damed Imanov[edit]

Damed Imanov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is under question. Doesn't meet criterias of WP:BLP Toghrul Rahimli (talk) 06:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. Toghrul Rahimli (talk) 06:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Damed Imanov's article meets this criterion
  1. The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times.
  2. The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field.--Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 07:25, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He led the fleet of such a large company as SOCAR, and this in itself proves that he is an important person.--Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 18:55, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also Damed Imanov was awarded more than 20 honourary rewards. In 2010, he was awarded honourary diploma “Inam” upon the order of Trade Union of Media Workers Presidium. For his further achievements he was honoured an international award of Ukraine and Russia – 1 degree order of “Cossack glory”. On the 90th anniversary of the Great Leader Heydar Aliyev, the “Dede Gorgud” International Foundation honoured Damed Imanov with the national reward of “In the name of peace on earth”.

He was awarded the Medal "For services in the shipping industry" by the Order of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan and its this proves that HE made a wide contribution to the ship industry.--Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 19:28, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Reference 2[6] meets the GNG, I think. The publication seems OK. It is a happy birthday article, featuring a notable person not connected to the publication, and it contains significant commentary on the subject. The other references do not, but do substantiate a series of awards that he has won. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. az:Daməd_İmanov has been deleted three times, and is currently deleted. There appears to be irregularities with the article history and deletion discussion. Sort it out on the native language Wikipedia before attempting re-creation here. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:28, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 03:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So you pinged only the people who had voted "keep" at the time. Smells like WP:CANVASSING to me. 1292simon (talk) 13:10, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, we see that there is a clear advantage in voting on this decision, and the arguments of Wikipedists justify the preservation of the article. Let the decision be made by the Wikipedia community, and not on a personal basis! Strong keep--Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@1292simon: the situation is complicated indeed, but i can clarify. The article was first deleted by Eminn and he closed the AfD as Delete. Then, a few days later, Cekli829 came back and changed the decision for no reason. It was against the rules so Eminn redeleted it. I don't know whether there were personal ties between Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) and Cekli829, but it is what it is. After a few weeks Cekli was dismissed from administrators list by Meta-Wiki for abusing admin rights. As a result, the article was deleted by NMW03, because Cekli was not an impediment anymore. And recently Elshad Iman applied to restore the page here. Some other details are not related to the article. My point is that, the medals Damed İmanov received don't make him be notable. For instance this list shows a certain fraction of official state medal and awards. As you can see there are orders which are on the top line. They are more important. There are tens of medals of Azerbaijan and they are awarded to thousands of people by President of Azerbaijan. Obviously, the list are announced on the official website of the President. He doesn't officially hand the awards, except for most important 3-4 orders. For instance in these lists, you can see how many people are awarded with Taraggi: [10] [11]. The section "“Tərəqqi” medalı ilə" shows the list - almost 80 people within two decrees. And the complete list of recipients goes beyond that (maybe thousands). His second award is nothing special either - it's a medal, not an order in the end. Due to the fact that this medal is recently-established and only given to sailors, it's less awarded. A large portion of sailors and even civil servants receive at least one or two medals during their service in Azerbaijan. --Toghrul Rahimli (talk) 08:24, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I remember that there was a conflict of interest among the managers who even wrote that I was the same person as the manager of Cekli829, but this is not true (what is written in the discussion of the article is similar to this baseless claim).

I think that this article should not cause us to oppose it because it is scandalous. My personal opinion is not the main one, but I applied for restoration in the Azerbaijan section based on encyclopedic criteria. For example, this article [12] is exactly the same as Damed Imanov's article. This person has been awarded the Progress Award and has other achievements. Thanks! --Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 03:00, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Elshad Iman (Elşad İman): the person has a honorary title of "Honored Engineer of Azerbaijan" he is considered as a notable person. --Toghrul Rahimli (talk) 08:24, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now the company is one of the most promising oil companies in the world, and the prospects for socio-economic development of Azerbaijan are associated with its activities. Leaders and the most active in public activities representatives of fairly influential political and public non-political organizations are considered encyclopedic personalities.

Pay attention to the article, about a person is also written in the Azerbaijani state newspaper, in the Azerbaijani book there is an article about him, several times awarded by the President of the Republic. All this gives reason to keep the article here. He is a man who has dedicated his life to shipping in Azerbaijan.--Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Including sections in other languages. So this is not an argument. Additionally, see WP:AADD in the words “No interwiki.”--Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 14:52, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1) Independent source: about “Damed Imanov”, on the portal of the state newspaper of the Azerbaijan Caspian Shipping Company (asco.az), on the portal of the Azerbaijan encyclopedia (ens.az), in the international magazine of Azerbaijan (mir-azerbaydjana.az), on the independent socio-political published in the newspaper (vyshka) and other sites.

2) Authoritative source: About "Damed Imanov", published on the authorized and official website of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan (President.az).

The page is free of spelling errors, long monologues, unstructured material that creates the frame, information that has been translated from another language and cannot be verified, myths, lies and slander.

· The page is not intended for vandalism.

· The page is unique and is not a copy of any page.

· The page is not spam, the content of the page is based on facts only.

I ask for an investigation and a consensus.Premeditated Chaos Thanks!--Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 13:59, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Elshad Iman (Elşad İman): Why do you ping other admins, to help to keep the article? You did this many times and warned. Not to mention that you have been blocked several times on azwiki, one them them for suing admins for deletion. There's no need to worry about the result of the discussion, even i have an article deleted here, and abide by the decision of the community.
It's obvious that you can create tens of millions of biography articles based on your criterias (neutrality, correct information; so on and so forth). If they don't meet notability of Wikipedia, then they are not encyclopedic. Let's not exaggerate the discussion with overt and unhelpful information and keep room for other volunteers to contribute to the topic. Thanks! --Toghrul Rahimli (talk) 15:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. It's feels like Elshad Iman is trying to WP:BLUDGEON through a Keep outcome here. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 21:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know why on earth I'm being pinged here; I have nothing to do with this discussion or this topic. ♠PMC(talk) 22:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I see no point in relisting yet again (non-admin closure) Akhiljaxxn (talk) 20:19, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pkah Thgall Meas[edit]

Pkah Thgall Meas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability guidelines. Couldn't find any coverage or any mentions on notable sources. Less Unless (talk) 15:21, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 15:21, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 15:21, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nightfury 11:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Or transfer the small amount of content to the actress Vichara Dany's page. The movie poster could be moved there too, as she is deceased and has no portrait; she is the woman dominating the poster. The simple fact is that with Cambodian articles it is frequently impossible to find reliable sources for pre-genocide Cambodia, because of the genocide itself. I don't feel comfortable erasing anything from before that has managed to survive, even in this sourceless form. Jacqke (talk) 04:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:31, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 03:42, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:32, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Wonda[edit]

Princess Wonda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. The sources in the article are primary sources and are not independent of the subject. The subject has not made a name for herself in London or Nigeria. She doesn't have a music career to speak of.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 18:42, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 18:42, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 18:42, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 18:42, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 18:42, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:51, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 02:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. GirthSummit (blether) 14:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Tessier[edit]

Edward Tessier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wholly fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. I'm seeing virtually no coverage of the subject. Very poorly sourced WP:BLP that has been around for way too long. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that the subject meets Wikipedia's notability standards and that the article should be retained. North America1000 06:36, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abbie Kamin[edit]

Abbie Kamin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a city councillor, not properly referenced as passing WP:NPOL #2. While Houston is certainly a large and important enough city that its city councillors could be deemed notable if they were citing reliable source coverage in media, that's not what this is doing: it's referenced to two primary sources and a WordPress blog, none of which are reliable or notability-supporting sources at all, and it essentially just verifies that she exists without documenting any evidence of her political significance. Even in major cities, the city councillors still are not handed an automatic inclusion freebie on bad sourcing just because they exist -- the inclusion test is still the depth of media coverage they can show to support a substantive article. Bearcat (talk) 18:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 02:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 07:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Naeem Ashraf Raja[edit]

Naeem Ashraf Raja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage found. Non-notable bio. Fails WP:ANYBIO. Störm (talk) 08:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:17, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kristen Idrettskontakt[edit]

Kristen Idrettskontakt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for three years I can find no independent sources, fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 13:37, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 13:37, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The source is a routine listing and not in-depth coverage. If you know of any Norwegian sources please add them. Theroadislong (talk) 17:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 02:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. GirthSummit (blether) 14:33, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wake (Trio Töykeät album)[edit]

Wake (Trio Töykeät album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Not enough sources exist for an article of substance. Vmavanti (talk) 22:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 05:56, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:08, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per Eggishorn, especially FT source. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 09:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Business Plus (TV Channel)[edit]

Business Plus (TV Channel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 17:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:30, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:30, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  07:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural Ecosystem[edit]

Cultural Ecosystem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is simply false. The term "cultural ecosystem", particularly with reference to "cultural ecosystem services", appears in scads of papers and published sources before 2013, the year when the article claims it was first used, and the article focuses entirely on the meaning attributed to it by a single person despite its tremendously broader use. If anyone is using term to connote the specific concept that Álvaro Pastor had in mind when using it in 2013, that specific concept appears far from notable insofar as the article sources it only to him, and Google returns no hits at all (other than two Revolvyy blurbs) for "cultural ecosystem" "alvaro pastor". Largoplazo (talk) 00:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Largoplazo (talk) 00:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Largoplazo (talk) 00:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui  22:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Catahoula Creek[edit]

Catahoula Creek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A stream in Mississippi. Unnotable per WP:NGEO. The article only contains two sentences, one stating it's a stream and another about what language the name is derived from. Flori4nKT A L K 00:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:18, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:20, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please reconsider your vote to delete this encyclopedic entry. The banks of Catahoula Creek were home to the Choctaw long before Europeans arrived. The Hancock County Historical Society mentions this on their website. [1] DavidDelaune (talk) 02:00, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Hancock County Historical Society. "Center-Caesar". Hancock County Historical Society. Retrieved 2020-03-27.

The source, citing Louisiana Place-Names of Indian Origin, does NOT say the Choctaw named this creek nor anything about its naming. Having a name and the etymology of such word is NOT information about the natural feature warranting notability! Reywas92Talk 06:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

According to GEOLAND, "named natural features are often notable". –dlthewave 16:11, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • taking this deletion argument (a bit) further we could suggest that most/all sources on any town/city are about the people/organisations/buildings/features in the said town/city and not about the town/city itself. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:29, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Manchester Pipe Band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 16:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Manchester Pipe Band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable pipe band. Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 00:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:16, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:16, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:03, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Holyoke Caledonian Pipe Band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 21:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Holyoke Caledonian Pipe Band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable pipe band. Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 00:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets criteria 1 for notability, "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself". Including the American Pelican Publishing Company, the Manchester University Press of the UK, the Springfield Republican, and Hartford Courant. Amongst those are citations establishing it as the oldest continuously operated pipe band in the United States, one which has participated in the Cowal Games. I could understand this being a { { refimprove } }, but none of those are self-published or band affiliated. In contrast to this and Manchester Pipe Band, a minimum 3 of the articles you've listed on your own user page have no 3rd party citations as of this writing, City of Seattle Pipe Band, Stonehouse Pipe Band, and City of Blacktown Pipe Band, some of which cite sources by members of said bands, or none at all. Please support your statement with additional information.--Simtropolitan (talk) 01:12, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message - I've realised from a few different responses (spread over a wide area) that there are significant differences of opinion on how notability works for piping related articles, and I might need to treat a bit more carefully rather than assuming that only a very few people care. Currently working out how to go about cleaning up these articles, and choosing which ones to nominate for deletion, in the future! Best, Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 15:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:03, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ravenswing:, they have everything to do with this matter- this is about consistency. If the bulk of piping articles must go that's one thing, but to cherrypick a few which offer independent sources while giving different treatment to those citing bands own websites, is unacceptable. And there are more than several sources which do in fact address this topic that fall within the purview of WP:Offline sources. All of these are searchable in the OCLC, Newsbank, and other reliable outlets. Even though Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, there is no distinction between using online versus offline sources. --Simtropolitan (talk) 21:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:20, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paris Port Dover Pipe Band[edit]

Paris Port Dover Pipe Band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-notable pipe band. Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:06, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:06, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:04, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. GirthSummit (blether) 14:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fredericton Society of St. Andrew Pipe Band[edit]

Fredericton Society of St. Andrew Pipe Band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable pipe band - think it fails GNG, no historical notability either. Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:04, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:04, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:04, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.