![]() |
The result was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is a serious example of WP:TRIVIA. If it belongs anywhere at all it is in Portuguese Water Dog as a passing mention. Fiddle Faddle 23:11, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:41, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciate there's a lot of interesting content here, but it is unencyclopedic and more of an essay. Totally unsourced with an excessive focus on India, and even if that was dealt with the content should all be included in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Management_theory.
Incidentally, the essay-type style and use of phrases like "the author while working for his company" make me wonder if this is a copyvio. I can't find any sign of the original online though, so it may have been written for WP. If so, it is original research. KorruskiTalk 22:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:41, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be another Morning277 article created by a single cowbird editor who created this article and has done nothing before or since. The references include Techsling and Yahoo! Voices, both of which are classic sources for Morning277 articles. The text of the articles cited reads like an obsequious eulogy, further suggesting the article's duplicity, and either no longer exist (are dead links) or have no authorship indicated. Ew. KDS4444Talk 21:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:41, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources to support the notability of this book. WP:SPA creator of article also created an article about the author, Edgar Perez. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Secret account 01:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined PROD. Kuwait is not a mountainous region and the article page states as much: Kuwait is a desert. There are not many mountains in the country
. The current article is populated with a single item, which is referred to as a ridge, not a mountain. In any case, I don't think this list is very useful per WP:LISTPURP. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 21:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:12, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Minor housing project. Does not meet WP:GNG at present. Dwaipayan (talk) 20:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:14, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Minor housing project. Does not meet WP:GNG. Dwaipayan (talk) 20:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:14, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Minor housing project. Does not meet WP:GNG. Dwaipayan (talk) 20:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nominator withdrew; no delete !votes are present. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 18:51, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails all criteria outlined at WP:PORNBIO. No sources or refernces, merely one line of biography and a long list of films. Appears to be an open and shut case. Finnegas (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was snow delete. BencherliteTalk 13:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Insignificant living person. the tone of the article is overly promotional, my honest assessment is that it is probably an autobiography due to excessive personal detail, and it is a clear speedy delete under promotion. Barney the barney barney (talk) 20:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC) Barney the barney barney (talk) 20:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable, sources only have trivial mentions of him (other than one). Insulam Simia (talk) 20:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sam 🎤 21:57, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a non-notable person. I can't seem to find any reliable sources heavily covering this guy. TCN7JM 23:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable guy. The tone of this article looks very promotional, and it might even be an autobiography. StevenD99 Talk | Stalk 00:22, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete i've added the tag. This is clearly a vanity article.
Comment The editor has stated that he is not Savio. Therefore it is not an autobiography. Insulam Simia (talk) 06:51, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. Jujutacular (talk) 03:19, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable musician. A Youtube sensation, and not much of one at that. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 04:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Extremely short stub (although this is alone not a reason for deletion), but although it may exist, searches for even a Korean language website under 대기고등학교, have revealed only social media listings. Does not therefore meet WP:GNG, and the lack of further reliable information confirming it as a mainstream K12 school would fail our precedent for keeping High Schools. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Rambling misdirected personal WP:OR commentary on an ill-defined subject. Nothing of value. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 19:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
NN rapper. Possibly autobio or serious COI. No references to assert notability. Fails GNG and BLP reference requirements. Alexf(talk) 19:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Secret account 02:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article was created by the sockmaster User:Edson Rosa. They have created many non-notable companies. This article has no sources establishing notability and I could find no substantial coverage establishing notability. I recognize that language could be an issue in establishing notability, so if this company is regionally, perhaps someone can find an independent reliable source. I am One of Many (talk) 18:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Keep — withdrawn by nominator.I am One of Many (talk) 20:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article was created by the sockmaster User:Edson Rosa. They have created many non-notable companies. This article has no sources establishing notability and I could find no substantial coverage establishing notability. I recognize that language could be an issue in establishing notability, so if this company is regionally, perhaps someone can find an independent reliable source. I am One of Many (talk) 18:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 04:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet WP:NCOLLATH. No pro playing time, so does not meet notability there either. WP:TOOSOON Gtwfan52 (talk) 18:32, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. No support for deletion, and any merge considerations can proceed through normal discussion and editing. postdlf (talk) 15:45, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article was created by the sockmaster User:Edson Rosa. They have created many non-notable companies. This article has no sources establishing notability and I could find no substantial coverage establishing notability. I recognize that language could be an issue in establishing notability, so if this company is regionally, perhaps someone can find an independent reliable source. I am One of Many (talk) 18:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article is not about a notable person. Just because he has a silly name, it doesn't mean that he's notable. Also, this page is an orphan.
Regentswift (talk) 17:44, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:16, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Writer who does not appear to be notable per our guidelines, WP:BIO. The awards mentioned in the article do not seem to be notable themselves. Only source cited is subject's own website. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 04:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article was created by the sockmaster User:Edson Rosa. They have created many non-notable companies. This article has no sources establishing notability and I could find no substantial coverage establishing notability. I recognize that language could be an issue in establishing notability, so if this company is regionally, perhaps someone can find an independent reliable source. I am One of Many (talk) 18:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep per above. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. I saw the last minute vote, but the original concern still stands. A fully referenced List of South American gas companies is acceptable, but not in the current form. Secret account 02:15, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A list of only one article and I cannot find list articles for natural gas companies for other countries. I am One of Many (talk) 17:33, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Secret account 02:14, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete : No references//Might be a pure fiction as no other article or related stuff found on net related to Klimovo air base except this one.//Claims made into the article are baseless. AnupMehra ✈ 17:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable film lacking Ghits and GNEWs of substance. Claim to fame is it is a "weird movie." reddogsix (talk) 17:29, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Does not mention the topic, being the prevention center, instead it is a lecture about the road traffic situation in IndiaPakistan. No sources. Fails WP:COATRACK, WP:NFT and WP:GNG. Ochiwar (talk) 15:57, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. I suspect that any close I make here is going to be whizzing along to DRV very quickly (you don't need to discuss with me, just let me know) but I have closed NC here because there doesn't seem to be agreement as to what actually comprises a deletion reason when a list doesn't fall under SALAT but is instead a split-out. Also, I note that at least one of the lists (List of songs recorded by Mohammed Rafi (A–C)) has started to be improved and sourced; I suspect that if all of the articles could be fixed in that manner there might be fewer issues; I agree that the pure lists are not, at the moment, particularly encyclopedic, but that's simply my opinion. Black Kite (talk) 22:29, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages because of the rational below:
Complete unsourced listcruft. Wikipedia is not a directory. Many, if not all of the entries are not-notable in their own right, so it fails WP:SAL. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 11:21, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Despite Great11 misleading vote count comment below as AFD is not a vote, consensus is clear here. Secret account 02:31, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article is short and shows lack of notability EuroCarGT 04:05, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please look at references french [30] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calise (talk • contribs) 09:34, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Gouvernement of Quebec Canada [31] Book [32] look at this please [33] dictionary of algerien artiste from book google — Preceding unsigned comment added by Great11 (talk • contribs) 06:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you --Calise (talk) 07:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[38] lecarrefourdesopinions [39] lavireedesateliers [40] Aures [41] [42] [43] Maghreb culture [44] [45] Radio Canada [46] [47] arabesques-editions [48] [49] Ministry of Foreign Affairs Algeria official site [50] El Watan newspaper Algeria 2010 [51] ADD 2BOOKS REFERENCES GOOGLE BOOK 2 DICTIONARY OF ARTIST OF ALGERIA into references LOOK THE YEARS 2010 [52] book Algérie Art Plastique 2010 , Mansour Abrous, edition L'Harmatan [53] book Dictionnaire des artistes algériens: 1917-2006 - Page 25, Mansour Abrous, 2006, edition L'Harmatan [54] [55] THANK YOU --Calise (talk) 19:03, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of valid reliable sources. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write a good article about him, but this is not that article and these are not the sources that are going to get it there. Bearcat (talk) 06:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC) comment'[reply]
The devoir i get it sorry [56] Thank you--Calise (talk) 08:01, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
now What you think? we keep or we delete , I'm calise user Thank you --Great11 (talk) 09:52, 25 August 2013 (UTC) I edit the article in french but it is short, and i edit many articles in wikipedia french bigger than that, but i must have reference to write and i need help because my english is not number one, but we must have consensus we deleted or we keep because all my articles are short like this article Thank you --Great11 (talk) 10:33, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
this article in Liberté (Algeria) news press in Algeria, like El Waten, They are important in Algeria [57] The Subject is Tatouag Berber in Aurès, the reporter give only name of only painter in Algeria who represent the Aures 'D’ailleurs, l’artiste peintre Amraoui Hacene, installé au Québec, réalise de belles œuvres avec ces formes millénaires' I translate 'Moreover, the artist Amraoui Hacene installed in Quebec, produces beautiful works with these ancient forms'. , the reporter don't give another name of painter, we Know they are many painters in Aures but Why the reporter write only the name of Hassane Amraoui,????? for promotion or for money or for notability ???? We Have many painters in Aures in France ,etc, like Cherif Merzouki (Aurès), for example [58] , seriously if Hassane Amraoui was not notable , i'm first one who ask for delete the article in wikipedia in project Algeria french or another language , believe me and you can check for that in french wiki or english i have story in wikipedia since 2006 ( not reason to keep article i Know that ) , but i think the problem is language and others problem internet in Algerai since 1990 at 2000, but we have the text of Yve Lavo or [59] , the short article, in Devoir, yes but the drawing table is the prix (award) or prize , Why Hassane Amraoui drawing tables ( tableau de peinture) or canavas was the award or the prize, Marie receive it at Montreal ( honour)???? and [60] ( Reporter of news press El Waten at Montreal) and i have that [61] search for article of El Waten or [62] it is my last comment. Thank you very much for your time Bearcat and all users and 1000 sorry for my basic english, we keep or we delete, you decide, but i told keep --Great11 (talk) 16:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC) NB Ali Kichou is Notable but when i search in net look that [63] and that [64] he live in Canada too--Great11 (talk) 21:36, 25 August 2013 (UTC) please look at that M'hamed Issiakhem the great and the best painter of Algeria [65] wiki after Youtub and blog --Great11 (talk) 21:52, 25 August 2013 (UTC) Adel Abdessemed school of art of Batna Aures please look [66] same thing site blog gallery press facebook --Great11 (talk) 22:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I found this text in net is in french Vues d’Hassane Amraoui
Article publié par Emilie Fondanesche _ Touki Montréal : 27 / 04 /2010
Source
And Yve Salavo blogg is Yvesalavo Yvesalavo [67] biographie of Yve Salavo Yve Salavo --Great11 (talk) 03:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
ok Thank you i delete sorry !--Great11 (talk) 05:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC) You delete it's ok --Great11 (talk) 05:42, 26 August 2013 (UTC)--Great11 (talk) 05:42, 26 August 2013 (UTC)--Great11 (talk) 05:42, 26 August 2013 (UTC) ok we delete but if i found or you found we can write the article , i edit some articles like that we delete because without independent reliable source ?--Great11 (talk) 05:57, 26 August 2013 (UTC) All the article Aïssa Djermouni,Ali Khencheli[reply]
Cherif Merzouki, Abdelkhader Houamel, Hassane Amraoui, Mohamed Demagh,Mohamed Temam, some here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Algerian_painters, etc. i think there is not independent reliable source you can check please before delete Caffeyw Thank you --Great11 (talk) 06:13, 26 August 2013 (UTC) we put[reply]
Article is short and shows lack of notability ....... ...... August 2013 (UTC)
I think we should waiting because i post in bistro ( wikipedia french ) one question, because for me all articles in visual art are notable ( sources) and discussion or consensus , because many articles in french wiki have the same references. i think we have big problem to resolve for notability. Thank you --Great11 (talk) 07:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Notability for french art Visual [[68]]
in french être représenté dans les collections d'un musée reconnu. avoir réalisé au moins deux expositions personnelles, critiquées ou présentées par des médias nationaux (télévision, radio, presse…).
i add one source arabic language we can see his picture from Newspaper Anasser [69].
from the bistro [70] i think, there is two articles from news papers and we have one book ( short biography) , we can keep the article. In Wikipédia english i don't found the article Wikipédia:Notoriété des arts visuels english language, i think we keep because we have many webs site inline ( news). In the article we change the sources , we can add Anasser, newspapers. we can choise only two news paper and only one book( short biography) to keep article ( Entv Algeria ( tv national of Algeria) present the artist since 1998 but we can't acces inline) and many nes papers Algeria but we can acces to that information inligne Thank you --Great11 (talk) 13:19, 26 August 2013 (UTC) if we can acces to this article of El Waten , it will be good the last article but since 2012 we can not acces to 97, 98, 97, 96 [71] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Great11 (talk • contribs) 13:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC) --Great11 (talk) 14:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)--Great11 (talk) 14:13, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
We can keeped i found a good source 2012, it have many books and news papers and catalogues of Algeria Tunisa , Paris and Montreal reference of Hassane Amraoui since 1994 to 2012 [72] page 62 and 63--Great11 Thank you (talk) 15:14, 26 August 2013 (UTC) But we need help to edit a good article , and i suppose it's still short --Great11 (talk) 21:12, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete 4 and keep 2. We have concuss to close discussion, I think we have 15 days for talking about sources. we delete. Thank you.--Great11 (talk) 04:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. --BDD (talk) 17:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The biography itself had to be deleted as a copyright violation from the subject's web site. All that's left is a list of performances and translations with no reliable independent sources to show notability or to verify the information. —Anne Delong (talk) 14:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now. Instead of deleting the biography, which is taken from the actress's website, why not simply rewrite it to avoid the copyright issue, as I have just done? Moreover, a Google search reveals that there are numerous links to independent sources. I don't read Turkish, so I cannot easily judge whether these include sufficient reliable sources or not. It appears that the actress has a substantial body of work over two decades with Turkey's most important national theatre company, so I would say that the article certainly claims notability. Once a serious effort has been made to see if this person is notable or not, we can make a better judgment as to whether to delete or not. My guess is not. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:26, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed ((prod)). Reason there was: "Appears to be nonsense: extremely vague, grandiose claims, unrelated references, lack of reputable sources, lack of citations, etc." I agree with all but "appears to be nonsense". I would add that the difficulty in categorizing the article might be an indication that the subject doesn't exist. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:57, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wrapper for a single template only. Then as it states, it is "designed for printing" the information (in black and white). IMO, we do not create separate pages targeted for print. Printing is in the toolbox (wiki page, lefthand menu). When the page is gone, its template is up for deletion too for this reason. -DePiep (talk) 13:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Secret account 01:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No indication that this is actually a rivalry, as opposed to two teams who are obliged to play each other regularly because of the nature of Australian soccer making this look more like WP:CRUFT than a genuine rivalry. Only two of the sources provided mention this game as a derby (and only one as the M1 Derby). There seems to be no events surrounding these games bar the matches themselves that indicate any rivalry worthy of note other than geographical proximity. As Gold Coast United no longer compete in the A-League it seems unlikely that this rivalry could develop beyond this embryonic stage. Fenix down (talk) 08:32, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:33, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No indication that this is actually a rivalry, as opposed to two teams who are obliged to play each other regulalry because of the nature of Australian soccer. The one reference provided makes no mention of any notable rivalry between the two clubs. Very little sourced prose making this look more like WP:CRUFT than a genuine rivalry. There seem to be no notable events associated with this "derby" bar the matches themselves other than a dive by one player in one match. Difficult to see how this passes WP:GNG Fenix down (talk) 08:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Given the robust participation and discussion involved, I don't think there's a great deal to be gained from relisting. --BDD (talk) 23:14, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No indication that this is actually a rivalry, as opposed to two teams who are obliged to play each other regularly because of the nature of Australian soccer. The two teams have only ever played each other three times, making this look more like WP:CRUFT than a genuine rivalry. Maybe a rivalry will develop, but you cant call this a derby / rivalry which passes WP:GNG after only a season and a half, particularly when there seem to be no notable incidents associated with the matches beyond the games themselves. Fenix down (talk) 08:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This is a well noted rivalry in Australia. It seems this surpasses notability guidelines (BigSoc (talk) 15:53, 26 August 2013 (UTC))[reply]
The result was delete. Secret account 01:59, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No indication that this is actually a rivalry, as opposed to two teams who are obliged to play each other regulalry because of the nature of Australian soccer. The one reference provided makes no mention of any notable rivalry between the two clubs. Very little sourced prose and the unsourced prose consists of a lot of pov and peacock terms making this look more like WP:CRUFT than a genuine rivalry. Fenix down (talk) 07:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WP:GOOGLEHITS does not establish notability. LibStar (talk) 15:36, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Should not have been deleted. Anyone who feels that this is not a rivalry needs to get their eyes checked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.184.244 (talk) 03:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spam. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unnotable DVD series. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:13, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:36, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails the notability requirement for entertainers. An actor with a string of very minor roles with no apparent large fan base or a significant "cult" following. Neither has he made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. Harry the Dog WOOF 14:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:37, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
simply being a mayor of a small municpality does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. his crimes whilst well reported does not meet WP:CRIMINAL. LibStar (talk) 02:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 04:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article describes a website with little demonstrable notability. I was able to find an article in the Huffington Post using Google News, but the article itself only mentions the website in passing. This was all I was able to find. Checking the edit history, user:sacredspace.ie appears to have made a few edits, but these appear to be minor, so this may outrule COI. -- Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:26, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep per above. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. LFaraone 23:27, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Highly promotional article for borderline notable physician. sourced mainly to promotional interviews he has given. Possibility of notability as an author, but the article would need to be entirely rewritten. DGG ( talk ) 02:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BAND. Deadbeef 10:50, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Secret account 02:36, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article does not pass the notability guideline for albums. It only includes a track listing, and all of the "references" are music videos from the track listing. None of the information in the infobox is actually sourced, and I couldn't find a source for it. TCN7JM 10:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. LFaraone 23:27, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources to establish notability of the subject of the article. Most of the sources given are blogs and this contravenes Wikipedia:Verifiability Collins719 (talk) 05:16, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. LFaraone 23:27, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable BLP. Some of his websites might be noteworthy, but he's really only gotten press because of those sites and his legal conflicts, not much of anything reliable exists about him. Going deletion instead of merge due to the lack of a relevant target. Thargor Orlando (talk) 12:32, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I understand the concern. However, perhaps the validity of McGibney's entry should not be based on his entrepreneurship per se but the legal case with Hunter Moore (who has an entry btw). It was the first case involving defamation via Twitter. Arguably, this case could very well be precedent setting. [1]. Admittedly, I am not nearly as experienced as most contributors, but doesn't this constitute making McGibney "notable"? or at the very least, his "action" is "notable" right? With respect, I am an offering an alternative view I see as pretty legit. Thanks for reading. TheYamMan (talk)
This looks like another notable legal issue. Can web sites like FB be liable for comments posted by users? Looks like they can if Web site helped users "create" the content. Where's the line? A Federal lawsuit has been filed. Covered by legal anchor Dan Abrams for Good Morning America.[1].TheYamMan (talk)
Sorry, I'm back. I just found this too. It's basically saying that McGibney went after TV personality Kate Gosselin's online bullies. Not sure how McGibney got the info on the perps though.[1]. Also, not sure if that makes it notable on its own. Yet, now Gosselin is suing her ex Jon Gosselin and writer Robert Hoffman apparently, at least based in part, on a series of text messages McGibney posted on Bullyville.com.[2]. Again, not sure if this constitutes notable legal action, but doesn't seem like everyday legal jousting either. McGibney seems to be at the center of several high-profile legal questions when it comes to Internet privacy and liability. Not sure if it's a crusade or what, but I don't think this activity will fade. I also don't see anyone else really doing this sort of thing. TheYamMan (talk)
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 04:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Quick Google search doesn't show any WP:RSes to support notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:38, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep per Gongshow. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There seems to be absolutely no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources pertaining to this entity; witness a search in English and two in Romanian. - Biruitorul Talk 05:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Secret account 02:23, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Appears to be a copy of [106], to add to the marginal majority in favour of deletion Black Kite (talk) 11:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article does not seem fit for Wikipedia for the following reasons:
The result was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:13, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is a non-notable place; there are mentions of it online, but none of the sites are reliable sources. In addition, while Wikipedia is a gazetteer, there are no policies or guidelines outlining what we are to do with articles like this one. It has been stated that AfD trends have supported allowing these kinds of articles; AfDs are not policies. In this case, Coffins Corner fails the standard WP:N policy. An article need not exist for every place where there is a house. Legally-recognized places and unincorporated townships mentioned in reliable sources are another matter. —Theodore! (talk) (contribs) 02:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced BLP, advertising The Banner talk 02:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
_____ I think that the references and the changes AllyD made to the site are related more to her husband and their relationship than to her professional career and Ivorypress. Therefore I think they should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IPSpain (talk • contribs) 17:27, 20 August 2013 (UTC) — IPSpain (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
The result was redirect to Wine dispenser--Ymblanter (talk) 07:17, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to fail the notability requirement. Most of the sources are internal Wikipedia resources or commercial websites. I don't think an NSF certification or patent count towards notability either. Some Googling brings up a few mentions in periodicals. Also, the article is very nearly an orphan. PierceG (talk) 02:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:ORG. Nothing of note in gBooks, no news coverage in gNews, no indication there are unaffiliated RSs sufficient to establish notability. Novaseminary (talk) 01:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If it can't be verified, no article, no merging., however note the SOFTDELETE link. Secret account 02:40, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No significant improvement since PROD; same issues. Elvey (talk) 06:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Secret account 02:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem like a very notable person. It seems like this page is being used as spam for Jeremy Shafer's YouTube channel. Andrewpmk | Talk 01:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Secret account 02:10, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is a promotional article. This doctor has no relevant research or career beyond a regular medical practitioning. Now he has published a book and he or some related person is trying to promote him in wikipedia in several languages. Fjsalguero (talk) 18:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be thoroughly insignificant from the perspective of a worldwide encyclopedia. He's the head of a unit connected with the Hospital for Special Surgery; if that's the biggest thing you've done, you almost certainly don't pass the notability bar. So he appears on some webpages from the website of his employer — what a surprise! There's no evidence of in-depth coverage from reliable sources independent of him, and a couple of papers don't make him notable as an academic. 2001:18E8:2:1020:5C69:D059:29BC:F807 (talk) 16:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 04:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion per WP:CSD#G4 was declined on the grounds that the article was sufficiently different from the last version. This does not change the fact that he still has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article still fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Mree. --BDD (talk) 18:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet notable. Fails WP:NALBUMS. GHits consist mainly of social media and promotional sites. Only one GNews hit. Declined PROD. GregJackP Boomer! 20:56, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Secret account 02:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This was deprodded without explanation. The term is a non-notable neologism (coined in 2010 apparently) with no independent sources. The article reads like an essay and is basically original research. What sources that have been added have no connection to the topic (most reference surrealism) and essentially serve to point out that this article is original research and there is no use of the term outside the context of the artist who coined it. Fails WP:GNG. freshacconci talk to me 00:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
154))
The result was delete, there is nothing to merge.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:08, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable, promotional. Declined PROD. GregJackP Boomer! 00:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7 (product, company, and website names are all the same), g11 ad. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A 19-day old product is not yet notable. Clearly a case of WP:TOOSOON Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:01, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]