The result was Delete per failure of WP:WEB. --Nishkid64 00:33, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I feel that this article isn't very significant, and doesn't deserve a place in wikipedia. Simply an article that advertises/tells about the game. Website does not generate many visitors. Fails WP:WEB criteria. Does not even have a page rank on Alexa. GamePlayer623 02:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete per failure of WP:BIO and WP:VAIN. --Nishkid64 00:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable editor; fails both the WP:BIO and WP:VAIN criteria. Google shows around only 33 relevant Google results--TBCTaLk?!? 23:20, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable Star Wars modding forum that fails the WP:WEB criteria. Alexa ranking of 543,182 [1] and few relevant google results [2].--TBCTaLk?!? 23:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It is a non-notable website that offers little more information than a list of cartoons hosted by the site. GShton 00:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was del `'mikka (t) 18:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"is currently in the process of creating a TV show", Does a zookeeper count as being notable, when he hasn't done anything notable yet? Nekohakase 00:21, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This website does not meet any criteria for notability. Specifically, it is "...not notable enough to be described by multiple independent sources..." (the main page is linked to by 27 pages as per Google, none of them notable). Further, the article does nothing to describe the website in an encyclopedic manner; it "...[offers] no detail on the website's achievements, impact or historical significance...." (Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information) I propose to delete the article and not merge it with Andrew Murray (tennis player); a link to this website as an external fan site already exists on the Wikipedia article. Iamunknown 00:26, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, I think it should be deleted, it has no encyclopedic value, it's been set up purely to promote a website and that's not what Wikipedia is about.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable independent record label. ghits: [3] NMChico24 00:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary list. What possible purpose can listing a pundit's opinion of who he feels are "far left" serve? Carlos M 00:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
wikipediatrix 02:35, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Google turned up very little on this wrestler. Appears to be a small time wrestler that isn't very known. Also appears to be vanity, since the user that made this is called MeliChaCha. RobJ1981 00:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.254.71.25 (talk • contribs)
The result was redirect, since a clear majority seem to think he doesn't deserve his own article. Grandmasterka 20:12, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem to meet WP:CORP. I thought the company was well-establish, but it turns out it's just a year old. It claims to be the "leading" company, but doesn't define that at all. Anyway, the article is essentially an advert. Google brings up nothing independent. No reliable sources = No verification. Also nominating:
I would also recommend we examine Tbmin, since his page is a redirect to the company page. Wafulz 01:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This page was created by the company's co-founder. The company doesn't seem to be notable. Closercate1 22:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
--Wow, you got away with it for a whole year?! I'm sure you're oging to donate all of ur procedes to Wikipedia ;-) Closercate1 23:21, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Grandmasterka 20:30, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article looks to have been created for the sole purpose of promoting the creator's website game (the first in the list), which violates WP:nn Closercate1 22:22, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant 01:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
After reading this I have no idea what this is, other than it is somehow connected to World War II. A Yahoo! search yielded 1,620 hits; 19,200 with Google. DRK 01:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently non-notable company, possible vanity. Google finds no secondary sources. Created by single-article user. RandomP 01:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that this does not meet the criteria at WP:WEB. The article was deleted once via PROD, but re-created by the original author, which qualifies as a contested PROD. Joyous! | Talk 01:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. It would have helped if you had cited sources that mention said awards, keep voters. Grandmasterka 20:43, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is about a school choir activity. There are 102 unique Google hits [9], but I did not see any that might establish the notability of this choir. They have not released albums like Kashmere Stage Band once did. They do not meet the proposed WP:ORG. I would just suggest a merge with the school article, but it is just as hopelessly cluttered with unencyclopedic information as this article is. I delayed this nomination for over a week with the hope that the creator or other interested parties might improve the article to establish notability, but no edits took place. Erechtheus 05:29, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep, real town. Kusma (討論) 08:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Small none notable town in India--M8v2 21:24, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. We're not looking for whether or not she won an election... We're looking for whether she meets WP:BIO, and as far as I can tell, BlNguyen is the only one who's made any progress towards answering that question. Next time this gets nominated, let's hear some real arguments instead of juvenile mudslinging. And Emcee, "sysop" and "admin" are the same thing. ;-) Grandmasterka 21:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hong Tran was a minor Democratic candidate in Washington United States Senate election, 2006. She received some play in the local and national press because the incumbent Democratic senator, Maria Cantwell voted in favor of the authorization to use force that preceded the Iraq War and, while she is critical of the handling of the war, she remains in the "Stand down as the Iraqis stand up" camp and Tran is in the immediate withdrawal camp. Tran may also be the first Vietnamese-American to run for US Senate. However, so far she has received little more than 5% of the Democratic primary vote while Cantwell garnered just shy of 91% of the vote. Bobblehead 01:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP She is a newsworthy person that ran a campaign that was concerned with the issues of her community. She did not run for fame or glory, but to make a difference. Yes, she was unsuccessful, but mentioning an Asian American contributions to the American melting pot and her desire to and become an influentical candidate has spoken alot about how important she is in the Asian community and the American community in her state.
Bnguyen 20:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I have been the primary author of this article for the past few months. The deletion proposals seem to be in regard to the notability of the subject. Hong Tran was cited in multiple respected publications as Maria Cantwell's main challenger for the Democratic nomination, and was regarded as the standard bearer for the solidly anti-war contingent of the Democratic party in the primary. She recieved a considerable amount of press during the primary campaign, including mentions in multiple articles and one feature article in the Washington Times (in Washington, D.C.), a mention in the New York Times, articles in major newspapers throughout the state of Washington, and feature audio interviews on NPR as well as others. She received endorsements from the Democratic caucuses in four of the legislative districts in the state, including the sole endorsement in Cantwell's home district, the 32nd LD. She is the first Vietnamese-American to campaign for Senate in the state of Washington, and likely in the entire country, according to the Northwest Asian Weekly newspaper. She may continue to influence the outcome of this U.S. Senate election with her endorsement or lack of it, and any other words or actions during the general election, and she may also remain a public figure and run for another office. Hong Tran also passes the Google test, with about 16,800 hits for a search of ["hong tran" senate].
Both Nottingham in particular (Bobblehead as well) have put a lot of weight on the fact that Tran only got about 5% of the vote in her second-place finish in the primary. I have argued that the size of the vote alone does not determine the significance of a campaign or a candidate. Ralph Nader never even got 3% of the vote, yet was a notable presidential candidate. Neither raised or spent lots of money; both ran grassroots campaigns for the purposes of making statements about the political system, about the parties, to influence the political debate and party platforms, and to allow voters an avenue to express their conscience. Some people understand the significance of this; other people don't. I would consider a pro/con style insertion into the Hong Tran article where both sides of this could be heard (with propertly balanced language); I think this is a common way of dealing with these sorts of controversies in Wikipedia.
It should also be noted that the article has received considerable modifications (about 110 edits) since Nottingham began contributing five days ago on the morning of Sept. 19th (which also happens to be the day the primary election occurred, or the night before, in Washington state time). Bobblehead made this AfD request in response to ongoing "edit wars," mostly over was constitutes NPOV or relevant info. In response to what I consider uncivil treatment and improper edits, I have been attempting to seek neutral mediation for over the past few days. User: False Prophet from the Mediation Cabal had accepted the case for mediation just prior to Bobblehead's AfD request. Assuming the AfD request ends up being evaluated, I will be posting a link here to my preferred version of the article, such that it will show some of the information and citations that have been either deleted or severely modified in the name of "NPOV", "Streamlining", significance, privacy, or any number of other reasons why this article has been trimmed. In some cases, supporting info has been trimmed away and then the original content subsequently deleted for lack of support.Emcee 03:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
e! Sdedeo (tips) 06:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*Weak delete per nom. It's really hard to even give more than abstain, but I can't just say "delete". --Dennisthe2 20:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
--Nottingham 17:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Emcee keeps making an AfD about the Hong Tran entry a discussion about me (Nottingham). That has grossly tainted the AfD process -- after Emcee's repeated mentioning of my name, a few comments came in as Keep that implicitly or explicitly mentioned me, clear evidence that the AfD process has been tainted by Emcee's repeated discussion of me on this page instead of the merits of the AfD subject itself. --Nottingham 12:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think that Dennisthe2, who seems to be an active and neutral Wikipedia observer, has the right idea. Simply start a new AfD fresh. I will gladly not participate other than reprinting my original comment (see top of page; in brief, Hong Tran seems to be talented, accomplished, and admirable, but not notable and therefore the AfD should be deleted and redirected to the election entry). I suggest that Emcee participate in a new AfD without mentioning me at all. If Emcee would like to write 25 paragraphs on the new AfD, as long as they don't mention me, then he/she should do so. I told Dennisthe2 I had no concern with how he/she voted before and during his vote changes. That is clear public record. Nevertheless, I suggest to Emcee that Emcee should show more respect to Dennisthe2 and to other Wikipedia community members by treating the AfD as an AfD, and not make misleading comments about any person's stance to Keep, Delete or Abstain. Emcee is welcome, as far as I am concerned, to start a Wikipedia entry called "Why Nottingham is a Bad Person" or to put such entries on my User Page. I have no quarrel with that. However, I do not understand why Emcee has taken it up him/herself to apparently misrepresent Dennisthe2's opinion. Dennisthe2 has said his choice is Abstain. If he chooses to make his opinion known as Keep or Delete, I am sure he will do that. However, it seems inaccurate and misleading for anyone to quote his prior opinions of Delete and Keep. --Nottingham 12:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Michael.Niemann (talk · contribs) nominated this as a speedy, but advertising isn't a criterion for speedy deletion, so I'm bringing it here. Original argument said: This article has been nominated for deletion because it lacks importance, and reads like an advertisement. -- nae'blis 02:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Web phenomenon, no evidence of notability or verifiability provided. Not every web site with 14-1/2 minutes of fame meets WP:WEB. Thatcher131 02:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. (I think there are roughly 6.5 billion people who've never heard of this.) Grandmasterka 21:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Website fails the WP:WEB criteria; Alexa ranking of 240,358 [25]. Possibly also redirect to Leo Laporte instead.--TBCTaLk?!? 03:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*Merge into Leo Laporte it is his forums afterall. - Mike Beckham 09:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC) Changed to Delete user keeps adding spam and promotional material from the podcast. Obviously article is just a home for spam now. - Mike Beckham 02:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:56, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Where to start? Not encyclopedic, list cruft, WP:V, ... Content duplicates that already in Warriors (book series) (which i'm not listing for AFD but would appreciate some eyeballs on along with Warriors: The New Prophecy characters (book series), Warriors Characters (book series) and Firestar (Warriors). Thanks/wangi 03:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You do realize that if you delete this article, you delete all of the herb info to, right? Also, it's not "rat bile" it's mouse bile. Most of the herbs uses are correct. Thylacine lover 03:02, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:56, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Second prod added by User:Chidom with reason "He has made one film; not important enough for an article." This is a procedural notice, I remain neutral. See WP:PORN for a relevant standard in development. Note that as a gay porn star, the normal WP:PORN standards don't apply so clearly. Mangojuicetalk 03:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 08:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Creating AFD discussion as my prod was disputed. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought and that's what this article is. There are no verifiable references to cite. We certainly don't need an article about this. I think its mention in cannon fodder or Redshirt (stock character) is more than enough. Also, it should not be shorted to a simple definition either, wikipedia is not a dictionary. I know it's a cliche in use, but just because something is noteworthy doesn't mean it's appropriate for wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:Notability for info on this. Also, one could argue that the stormtrooper effect is a neologism without verifiable sources and thus an innapropriate article. When and if there are good sources to make an article for this phenomenon I'd encourage it, but as it stands this article is not appropriate. See Wikipedia:Avoid_neologisms for further info. Crypticgeek 03:43, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Kla'quot 07:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable erotic film actress. — Joshua Johaneman 04:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced definition; wikipedia is not a dictionary, and especially not a dictionary of rambling comments on strange internet acronyms Sdedeo (tips) 04:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 86.139 is me, curse my not clicking 'remember me' this morning. QuagmireDog 10:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 08:54, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
None notable kind of soup. Stub article can't be expanded any further. Prob doesn't taste good either--M8v2 21:30, 24 September 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result was speedy keep, real town. Kusma (討論) 08:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Small none notable town in Poland--M8v2 21:23, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 08:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
None notable person. Feels WP:BIO. Further proof check his IMDB profile.--M8v2 21:27, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep, real town. Kusma (討論) 08:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
None notable town in a none notable area--M8v2 22:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. —freak(talk) 15:49, Sep. 27, 2006 (UTC)
Obscure non notable game.--M8v2 21:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:57, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod (which I'd added, if anyone needs to know). Basically, what we have here is a high school student who seems like a talented young man and probably has a bright future - the key word being "future", as in not right now. The closest thing to notability is a collection of awards for public speaking and the fact that he spoke at a ceremony for an important religious figure. As a speaker and debater myself, I know it's not easy to win those sorts of awards, but they don't really equate to notability I don't think. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 04:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:57, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Non-notable discussion forums for the website Narutofan (whose article has been deleted and namesapce salted) which fails WP:WEB guidelines of notability. Proposed to be merged with the main Naruto article, but as I argued on the article's talk page, there's nothing in the article that's relevant to the series. NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 04:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:58, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The subject of this article fails WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC. The only real claim to notability is an album supposedly to be released in 2007. WP:NOT a crystal ball. Creator sought to use semiprotection template and edit summary to avoid edits. Article has been deleted pursuant to speedy and prod. If deleted this time, perhaps it is time to salt. Creator is apparently an A&R rep using an account name that mirrors the supposed label of the album release, so there are also spam/vanity elements to this article. Erechtheus 04:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:58, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seems very much like a non-notable neologism per WP:NEO; also note no sources per WP:RS. Crystallina 04:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge and redirect to Clerks. --- Deville (Talk) 17:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:WEB. No external press coverage that I found. The official website has an Alexa ranking in the 1,600,000 range. Crystallina 04:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted by Evil Monkey per CSD A7. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryulong (talk • contribs)
Contested PROD. Delete as patently non-notable. A specific program designed by a high school marching band? The very essence of WP:NFT, also fails WP:RS and likely violates WP:OR, probably WP:VANITY. --Kinu t/c 04:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. —freak(talk) 06:09, Sep. 30, 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
ATTENTION!
If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether an article is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads (or socks). You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing! |
non-notable actress who's appearing in a local community theater production of Rocky Horror in Ohio. Fails WP:BIO and reeks of vanity. wikipediatrix 04:55, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Grandmasterka 22:04, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. Does not meet WP:WEB Simonkoldyk 05:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KeepThis should always stay as this page shows easter eggs and this is extremly popular. Mariokid19 06:08, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
The result was delete. Dakota 23:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fancruft that fails WP:N per WP:FICT. A minor character in the Sword of Truth series that doesn't need their own article. NeoFreak 07:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect, content already merged. --- Deville (Talk) 17:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fancruft that fails WP:N per WP:FICT. A very minor character in the Sword of Truth series that doesn't need their own article. NeoFreak 07:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. The keep arguments don't seem strong enough to outweigh even the "per nom" delete arguments. Deathphoenix ʕ 20:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fancruft that fails WP:N per WP:FICT. A very minor character in the Sword of Truth series that doesn't need their own article. NeoFreak 07:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod, apparently a hoax as evidenced by the talk page. No relevant Google hits, no reliable sources. I was almost about to rougely delete this one, but would prefer to have this discussion for later reference. Also nominating Rob Kokarinen for deletion. Kusma (討論) 07:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Grandmasterka 22:17, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was debating whether this article should be deleted for lack of notability, and while my feeling is that we should keep (weakly) it, I decided to AfD it to see what the consensus is. As I see it, reason for deletion would be non-notability. He's far less notable than the lengthy term as a legislator would suggest, as not only were "mainland representative" legislators in that era not subject to elections, but they were rubber stamps for KMT central government policy with little influence themselves. However, the lengthy service itself might make him sufficiently notable. --Nlu (talk) 08:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Grandmasterka 22:20, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod, spam/advertising, no alexa rank, not even launched yet according to article. Khatru2 08:07, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Dakota 23:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested WP:PROD. The ((dated prod)) tag was removed and restored several times. Original PROD reason was "vanity page". Original autor is Richardjolly, so this is quite possible. Delete for failing to meet WP:BIO: the given external links give little information about him, and do not interview him about his person, but about some game. Kusma (討論) 08:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete both articles. --- Deville (Talk) 17:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also Scarab (Empires of Ambition). NN online forum; fails WP:WEB Percy Snoodle 08:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 15:20, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
An obscure black metal band, speedied as A7 but contested. Nothing on allmusic, nothing on Amazon, one former member who was once amember of an even more obscure band. Guy 09:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete, not notable or verifiable. Thanks/wangi 20:18, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Obscure racist metal band, not on allmusic, not on Amazon, article appears to be original research. Guy 09:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 16:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The only information in this article is about the subject's time on Big Brother, and this information would be better on the relevant season's article. jd || talk || 09:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Originally deleted as a non-notable band (I found the original article and put the tag on, no idea who deleted it), this new incarnation of the article has the band touring and releasing an album. Sadly, Google's never heard of them or their "platinum album" BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 09:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy deleted -- Longhair\talk 07:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This one comes courtesy of a contested (i.e. the text was changed from one selling coffee beans to one selling gold bars) speedy. Charitably, I think we're dealing with someone using Wikipedia to advertise. Uncharitably, am I the only one smelling something Nigerian Letterish about the whole thing? BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 09:21, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing in the article suggests that this guy might be notable, and most of the content is Big Brother information. jd || talk || 09:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Big Brother (USA season 6). Jaranda wat's sup 20:29, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Former Big Brother contestant. Information about what she did on the show doesn't make me think she is notable; information about what she's done off the show definitely doesn't make her notable. jd || talk || 09:46, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 21:59, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article doesn't make me think this person is notable; just heaps of unimportant stuff. jd || talk || 10:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, this article, 17 (Chrishan album) (AfD discussion), and Chrishan (AfD discussion) are all part of a systematic mis-use of Wikipedia for a publicity campaign by 3mgworld (talk · contribs) and SoulRiverUSA (talk · contribs) that extends back as far as May 2006. (See the history of Chrishan, which I have undeleted for the purpose of this discussion, and notice how the names and release dates of the "forthcoming" songs, movies, and albums have changed as the months have gone by, just as they have in this article in fact.) This publicity campaign has been acknowledged by SoulRiverUSA writing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrishan: "this article was authorized by SoulRiver CEO Chris Dotson", "I am just doing my job guys", "i cant believe how hard it is to do PR", "Im not sure you actually see how you are preventing me from doing my job". According to edits made to Toledo, Ohio and List of people from Minnesota by 71.220.6.8 (talk · contribs), "Chris Dotson" is the 16-year-old "Chrishan".
Wikipedia is not a publicity vehicle, and none of this (the albums, the songs, and the movies) is verifiable. Uncle G 10:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was tagged for notability in June, and the tag remains with no apparant comments as to why it does pass WP:WEB. At that time it was also Proposed for deletion - this was removed, however, am unable to establish why given edit history since. Asp 10:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:23, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OR--Wdaoo 10:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Grandmasterka 22:30, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Crystal ball article about an edition or WWE RAW that has yet to occur. The only notability of the event its that it's an hour longer to commemorate a year on the USA network. –– Lid(Talk) 10:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn and or language--Wdaoo 10:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn people--Wdaoo 10:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was
ANNOUNCEMENT: It should be noted that AlQoraton was NOT the creator of this article, as has been suggested below, rather towards Jamino (me) should be directed any discrepancies in regards to posting regulations. It has been put forward that AlQoraton asked members to post their views on this debate via the TeamLorio.net web-forums. However, as he didn't write this article, it should be understood that rules and regulations regarding the posting of Articles on Wikipedia are unclear to him as, obviously, he has previously had no reason to have read them. However, as I seriously doubt the members of the TeamLorio.net forums will be deterred from defending this article merely by the notice posted above, I must also stress as the sModerator of the Forums in question that NOBODY from TeamLorio.net simply makes an account to tip the scales of this debate. This achieves nothing. This message has also been posted on the Forum itself.--Jamino 17:57, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deprodded, no where near WP:CORP/WP:WEB. Vanity wouldn't suprise me. Andeh 14:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
AlQoraton (Team Lorio's Mithrandir) comment's on the website linked to in the article say it all but there doesn't seem to be a plausible reason to keep a page about teamlorio.net on Wikipedia. --Charlesknight 13:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep, meets the sportsperson clause at WP:BIO as mentioned below. Daniel.Bryant 02:20, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable people--Wdaoo 10:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
One released LP. Doesn't meet WP:MUSIC Related to Things go unnoticed and Mouthstatic which are (or will be deleted) for similar reasons. - Mgm|(talk) 10:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article on a website that fails to assert notability. MER-C 10:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
original research--Wdaoo 10:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable websites--Wdaoo 10:45, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Monograph of single purpose account User:Schoolat, schoolatlas.com gets 117 unique Googles -wikipedia&start=150, Alexa rank is 2.4 million, most inbound links seem to be add-it-yourself directories and listings, Yahoo shows 1,200 inbound links (Google gets 170 million and my personal site served from my house by ADSL gets around 10,000). All in all, I see no objective evidence of significance. Guy 10:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 20:27, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Term (in quotes) gets around 160 unique Googles, but many of these are not for the site. Alexa rank is over the half million mark, Yahoo lists about 7,000 inbound links. Claim to notability is unsubstantiated as the law of the playground is a common term outside of the website. Guy 11:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 15:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Devoid of encyclopedic value MartinSpamer 11:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge to Ragdoll physics. Deathphoenix ʕ 15:25, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The previous discussion is here; however, the discussion failed to take into account that this fails WP:WEB and lacks any sort of external coverage other than blogs- see WP:RS. Crystallina 12:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Smerge: Contrary to the comment at top, the previous discussion did (albeit in limited fashion) take into account WP:WEB, but in any case the article is probably not particularly useful in its own right but should simply warrant a small section or merely a link under Ragdoll physics. I was looking for material on the algorithm and Google happened to find this one first, obviously because of outside links, but I'm pretty sure I'd have found the "main" article in due time. If nothing else, something mentioning Tetka should probably be preserved for its historical value (as being influential in spreading awareness of Ragdoll physics if nothing else). PeterHansen 18:33, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --- Deville (Talk) 17:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:WEB. Alexa ranking=5,825,727 [50]. Zero Google News hits [51]. ZimZalaBim (talk) 12:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article is spam for a commercial site. Rob (Talk) 12:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. Deathphoenix ʕ 15:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced and speculative at best (Note that requests for references and citations have been in place for over a month with no responce). Much of this seems to be Original Resarch. Without any clue as to who came up with the theory or who supports it we can not tell if it is notable or not. Blueboar 12:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest simply changing the word from Theory to hypothesis till there is enough citable evidence to support it. The word hypothesis supports this much better and can resolve this whole argument. I do have to say that there are places asking for citations that do not need it. I would ask the editor, and challenger to go back and rethink if you want regurgitation from some supposedly qualified article, or if you want the evidence to be substantial and still follow the hypothesis base.
I am going to have to reinstate this AfD nomination... discussion on the talk page has not led to any progress on the reasons why it was nominated in the first place. Again, serious issues with WP:V and WP:NOR. Blueboar 15:54, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. Alex | talk / review me | 14:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Very little content Alex | talk / review me | 13:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No proof available here or anywhere on the Internet. Article seems to be simply made up. BertieBasset 13:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Grandmasterka 22:43, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly NN. Saved from ((prod)) UtherSRG (talk) 13:48, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep Londeix, keep Malmasson, and no consensus on Chiti. Luna Santin 03:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
User:Musikfabrik has admitted to having been used for company promotion. All these articles by him seem non-notable: I may be wrong.
Also:
Adam Cuerden talk 14:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am not voting on Chiti or Malmasson as my objectivity has been questioned, however, without comment
But, since I have no connections what so ever with Jean-Marie Londeix (Well, Paul Wehage knows him, but you certainly couldn't call them friends...) and since Musikfabrik's one damning edit to that article consisted of changing "Jean-Marie Londeix" to "Londeix, Jean-Marie" in the categories listed, I will vote an very enthusiastic
It would helpful to update Londeix - as written, the article doesn't support his notability. Adam Cuerden talk 00:23, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete (per WP:WEB and WP:CSD A7. Luna Santin 03:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not well known. Small podcast. Tdcool 19:24, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:29, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This dab page is unnecessary: "necromancy (fiction)" and "necromancy in popular culture" are properly daughter articles of "necromancy", not completely separate topics which need to be disambiguated. They should simply be linked to from the necromancy page (and probably merged together into a single "in popular culture" page). Silence 01:13, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was moved as per nom. This is a problem which does not require deletion and has been dealt with. MER-C 10:10, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article uses a name that is used by multiple kings, and should be Neferkara I — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markh (talk • contribs) 23:38, 23 September 2006
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 16:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any notability beyond being "the only mall in Monroe" Johnbrownsbody 22:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Luna Santin 03:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'd just like to say that I considered this entry's previous content, a listing of all of all known professional wrestling promotions around the world, an unprecedented and indispensible resource for English-speaking wrestling fans everywhere (which, of course, is the very type of content a user-modified encyclopedia should strive to provide). I was shocked and saddened to see this immense patchwork of efforts removed from Wikipedia, and strongly encourage anyone with the capabiltiies to restore this entry's former information to do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bboyce17 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 23 September 2006
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright infringement, attacks and nonsense will be deleted without warning. Please check your factual data before posting - Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raveeta (talk • contribs) 09:17, 25 September 2006
The result was delete per notability concerns. Luna Santin 03:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable machinima series. Just another Red vs Blue parody. No sources to prove notability. At least the article isn't a mess like some of these have been. Drat (Talk) 14:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:26, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:28, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:26, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete, with no prejudice against this article being recreated (and undeleted) if the band gets signed and produces an album. Deathphoenix ʕ 15:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how this band is notable. This article was most likely created because the former lead singer Pete Bennett, whose article I nominated for deletion last month because I didn't think he was notable, was a member. According to the article, the band isn't even signed, and most of the article is about Pete anyway. jd || talk || 14:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Deathphoenix ʕ 15:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:48, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Luna Santin 03:23, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:CORP. Altia refers to many different companies and things: Altia, Inc. gives very little Google hits, but this may be due to the way the name is given. Altia + Photoproto (the only product which had its own article) gives 37 distinct Google hits. Fram 15:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding notability: Searching for "Altia Design" at Google Book Search and Google Scholar returns multiple results. Additional book and periodical publication names/dates/ISBN information can also be provided if necessary. Altian 20:14, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Problems with reliable sources, original research, and bias riddle this article. Based upon the content of the previous deletion discussion, as well as the dearth of input here, there exists consensus that this article should not exist. - brenneman {L} 06:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Previously kept by default at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SGGS on Meat, but a strong majority in favour of not having an article here (merge + delete advocates significanctly outnumber keep). Keep arguments included it is important to sikhs to learn about what their holy text tells them. It is important to convey this message to sikhs (sorry, no, Wikipedia exists to convey information to a general audience, not doctrine to a given faith). We have an article on Sikh diet, which is where what verifiably neutral information on this topic should go. We also have this article on the Shabads from Guru Granth Sahib (SGGB) on meat. Sikh diet is hard to understand, poorly formatted and so on, which does not help, and I am afraid I do not understand either article well enough to perform the merge. Those who do, evidently have no interest in doing so.
Above all, this article, "SGGS on meat", is both an apparent POV fork of Sikh diet, which says that meat is acceptable to some Sikhs, a position disputed by this article by reference to the Guru, and original research, a mixture of polemic and quotes from the original source, including in non-Western scripts referenced in each case to the primary source. Maybe there is a place for this on some sister project. Guy 15:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As a Sikh and interested party oin Sikhism I would have agree about deleting this, namely because the biased nature of the article. The meat issue is dealt elsewhere within the wiki and Sikhism, there is no need to include a specific one for SGGS and Meat. If this is to be allowed then current ammendments that are being undertaken by our memebers at sikh-history.com should be allowed. --Sikh-history 15:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Grandmasterka 22:50, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Advertisement for non-notable product; author's sole contributions consist of related spam. Prod tag was removed by author. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable MMOG. Fails WP:CORP and WP:WEB. Not even an assertion of notability is given. No reliable sources. Prod removed by anon without improvement. Delete. Huon 15:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, does not meet wikipedia:notability (people). Assuming the username of creating user user:Jldb0131 is initials, it seems likely that this is an wikipedia:autobiography. Thue | talk 15:26, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Grandmasterka 22:53, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned article about a military officer. No references, just innuendo. I doubt she's notable and Wikipedia is not a sopabox. kingboyk 18:04, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:24, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable,vanity,npov vio Shafta 19:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Chegg is valid and has a number of press sources online backing it.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, vanity? Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 15:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete - UtherSRG (talk) 17:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Reads more like an advert than an article. Dubious notability Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 15:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:34, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
repeat deletion
The following have already been deleted: StarCraft II (see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/StarCraft_II) and StarCraft 2 (see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2006_March_25#StarCraft_2). Content is still speculative. Olin 16:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Grandmasterka 22:59, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is advertising spam for a non-notable software comany hawking "Business Service Management" software - in plain English, that's a contact database. No real criteria of notability are shown in the article; it mentions that they have 40 clients (but they're "blue chip" clients!) It also claims that they have been cited as an "example vendor" in a number of obscure publications, and gives another reference backed up only by an email link. Finally, the article contains passages of sickening prose: Interlink Software are leading Business Service Management (BSM) into a new evolutionary phase, offering end-to-end visualization of the health of business services. Delete. - Smerdis of Tlön 16:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:34, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As with 2009-10 in English football this failed a previous Afd as "no consensus", however the second nomination on that article seems to have pretty strong consensus as a Delete as per Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Nominate on same grounds. QmunkE 16:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep all three. Daniel.Bryant 02:29, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed prod. These appear to be just arbitrary chemical compounds with no particular significance to them. Using standard chemical notation it is quite possible to create hundreds of thousands of arbitrary compounds (e.g. 2,3-dichloro-cis-butenol and so forth). Wikipedia is not infinite. Note that I would have no objection to merging these some place sensible. >Radiant< 16:14, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Grandmasterka 23:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced, miscellaneous list of bands from different genres (power metal, symphonic metal, folk metal). There is little enough agreement on the validity of the term "epic metal", finding bands that everyone agrees is epic metal is totally unrealistic. IronChris | (talk) 16:21, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Luna Santin 03:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
the article claims the subject is a mathematician. It does not back up the claim. The article describes a good math student. Math students are not really worthy re: WP:BIO. Jayron32 16:21, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Jayron, you are obviously not a mathematician. IMO is not about doing problems, it is a place where mathematicians gather to prove theorems and come up with new ideas. Speed has nothing to do with it. I am not an expert on this person, but I am sure he has contributed useful things to his field, we just need to find a source familiar with Tripathy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.31.114.157 (talk • contribs)
"Third party verification from a reliable source outside of publications by sponsors of the sport or activity should be provided to demonstrate that the subject is widely recognized as performing at the highest level."
If he is a competitor, we need to see evidence that he is widely recognized. I will warrant that merely finding third party sources that state such would be fine. Are there articles by outside sources that review his performance at IMO? Are there articles out there that talk about his performance as a math competitor? If so, cite them. If not, his notability is unverifiable by wikipedia standards.
Under BOTH claims, (that he is a notable mathematician, OR that he is a notable competitor), this subject fails the litmus test. If the article can be proved with valid citations to verify his notability as a mathematician OR his notability as a competitor, I will change my vote. However, until and unless that happens, this guy still doesn't pass the notability litmus test. --Jayron32 01:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Official Wikipedia policy. In order to argue that this article needs deleting, you must argue that IMO is not the highest amateur level of mathematics in THE WORLD. Since Arnav competed at IMO, the only way this article should be deleted is if the above is determined. IMO is obviously the highest amateur level of mathematics competitions in the WORLD, therefore this article should be kept. Also, @ Khukri: I am not Arnav Tripathy, as you can easily find out using my IP address, and the confirmed location of Arnav Tripathy. --Mysmartmouth 23:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not totally true. You do not have to be a student to make IMO, and 1/12 is not a definite number. Also, you ignore how hard it is to even make the US team for IMO. 6 out of over 200,000 initial AMC applicants make the IMO. That's definitely noteworthy in itself.
Jayron, I think at this point the only plausible reason for inclusion is reason #2. If you visit the Art of Problem Solving forum, the largest forum of professional and amatuer mathematicians, you will not find a single person who doesn't recognize his name. As for what you asked, there are no real math competition journalists or analysts. His techniques have been featured on AoPS, and the top two mathematical societies in America have recogzied him in their newsletters and journals (I added sources just now). This is a huge thing, because if you read the rest of the articles in these newsletters, you will see on what a great scale Tripathy's acheivement was.
Please consider changing your votes after viewing the additional sources I added. --Mysmartmouth 02:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Now, come on, let's please stop the nonsense. And the sentences
and
are laughably misleading. The AMS and MAA don't recognize Tripathy, they just report (in passing) that he is one of the contest winners. Good for him and I wish him all the best. Congress did not honor Tripathy. A few well-intentioned congressmen honored the members of the US Physics team. As for the argument that he's just as notable as an athlete competing at a high level, I'm sorry but I fail to be convinced by that argument because, like it or not, even talented mathematicians do not get the same kind of exposure as athletes. Quick, name one winner of a math olympiad of the past 20 years? The debate should not be over the value of his achievements (which is undeniable) but on the possibility of making this an article of encyclopedic value based on reliable sources. Sure it's as hard, if not harder, to win the math olympiad than to be a college quarterback but it's also very hard to raise five kids when you're on welfare and WP:BIO is not about how impressive the person's achievements have been. Pascal.Tesson 18:33, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Third party verification from a reliable source outside of publications by sponsors of the sport or activity should be provided to demonstrate that the subject is widely recognized as performing at the highest level."
The closest we have is third party verification of participation and placement; and even that is weak. So far we have no proof of the widely recognized threshold. A few dozen of his buddies at high school know about him. A few hundred people he faced at his math competitions have heard of him. I would figure "wide recognition" ought to include more people than could fill a gymnasium... I am not making light of his accomplishments. I have personally been involved in accademic competitions for a large part of my life. That doesn't mean that I think that the best accademic competitors need to be part of wikipedia. The nature of the competition itself lacks notability. Is that fair? Probably not, but we don't live in a society that places that rewards academic success or brain-power in that way. Wikipedia is not the place to change that. Wikipedia should only reflect the values of the society it reports on. --Jayron32 23:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Now I won't accuse anyone of sockpuppetry, but I think that anon's vote should be discounted as highly suspect. Note also that among the other supporters, JohnPatricks (talk · contribs) is (as pointed out earlier) a single purpose account. Thanks. Pascal.Tesson 12:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 20:35, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per failure to establish compliance with WP:SOFTWARE. Long essay on talk was unhelpful. - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
for emulators, I think looking at multiple emulation review sites, and hobby development (such as "demos") sites gives a good indication of how an emulator "ranks". review sites have people who try emulators, and given them a rating, and a comment/opinion. sometimes they also have user voting. another thing is the author of KiGB, one of the most accurate and known GB emus, has a selection of what he considers "best other emus" on his site, for benchmarking purposes: [59]. these things show there's a few GB emulators which are "in the race", or most popular, "best", etc. i think such things count as peer review, according to wikipedia's guidelines. a rough selection, in no particular order, is: no$gmb, bgb, visualboy advance, kiGB. I think inclusion in linux distribution is a less good thing for emulators because it biases towards GPL emulators, and linux distros have to look at "everything", not just emulators. while i listed a number of review sites considering bgb to be the best, on BGB's talk page, it seems that's irrelevant, and bgb (54000 google hits for bgb gameboy) is worth less than eXboy (84 google hits for exboy gameboy), and wzonka-lad (1110 google hits for wzonka-lad gameboy)Bewareircd 13:18, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
some people from a gameboy hobby community (#gameboy on efnet): dox: is a coder of demos, tools, and an emulator (hash). bgb is his emulator/debugger of choice. site: [60]. lord nightmare, involved in gnuboy. has done research on sound chips including the GB's. uses bgb. <LordNLptp> the fans and authors of a select few, typically bad, emulators tend to be the ones which get put on wikipedia. <LordNLptp> gnuboy is pretty much dead, the main site is down and i have probably the last remaining copy of the 1.0.4pre sourcecode <dox> bgb came a bit too late.. when gameboy was already dead <dox> ppl used no$for dev. but it was a bit buggy. martin knew about bugs and problems, but never fixed them.... Bewareircd 17:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: Bewareircd (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.[reply]
The result was Delete. I'm comfortable deleting the article at this point because relisting it only garned one extra !vote. Deathphoenix ʕ 15:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural nom. I see some problems with this entry, but it's certainly not unsalvagably incoherent or a G1 speedy as the nominator claimed so I am listing here instead. I need to get an idea if there's a place this can be merged to (per WP:FICT) or if it's verifiable to begin with (if it's not, it should be deleted). I'm not sure how notable the author is either, which is kind of important for the relevence of this entry. - Mgm|(talk) 08:24, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Steel 00:01, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable: "Minkowski Challenge" only returns one result on Google. Seems to be based on a forum discussion. Cordless Larry 16:45, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Moreover the debate in the forum didn't turn up with the google search, perhaps google is not quite updated on certain forums.
I think that "Paris Hilton" turns up millions of pages on google, far more that Aldous Huxley or William Blake, does this mean that Paris is more important to humanity ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.58.205.35 (talk • contribs)
I am Arthur. I have started the article myself. I agree to the anon. before me and i would like also to mention that Cordless Larry has immediately tagged the article as "non sense" just as it was posted. He didn't then mention anything about google searches. It seems that he is not neutral in his essential desire to abolish this entry as soon as possible. Arthur_B 25 September 2006 (UTC)
The result was Delete as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO. (aeropagitica) 20:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't believe that this subject satisfies the criteria of WP:BIO. No sources are given to support the claim that he is a "well-known software developer". Google hits for "Raymond Clement"+IBM total 19, while those for "Ray Clement"+IBM total 26, most of which are about a Canadian research scientist. (As I wrote when I initially proposed the article for deletion.) ... discospinster talk 17:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant 02:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete - NN UtherSRG (talk) 17:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) 20:44, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete - NN UtherSRG (talk) 17:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy deleted by Firsfron :This article was created in the last 48 hours and all of its revisions are unquestionably copyright infringements taken from http://www.netsweeper.com/solutions.php, with no assertion of permission. (CSD A8)) - Yomanganitalk 23:03, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
pure advertisment; could be a good article here (?) -- but not this. If you vote keep please edit the article. Sdedeo (tips) 17:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was as a non-notable web flash animation series. (aeropagitica) 20:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
De-proded. Non-notable flash series with no verifiable & reliable claims to meet WP:WEB. Only 240 unique Ghits for "Maximum Ninja". Scientizzle 17:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:40, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am pretty sure this article is not encyclopedic nor is it likely to become that way anytime soon. It doesn't seem to work with web guidelines and much of the article appears to be original research. --ScienceApologist 17:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. While the delete !votes are quite compelling, there were also enough strong keep !votes (such as Cyberskull noting that this map made Battle.net's Hall of Fame) to bring this out of a consensus to delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 15:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Insufficient assertion of notability for a fan-made Warcraft map. WP:WEB not met. Wikipedia is not a game guide. "Eve of the Apocalypse" warcraft -wikipedia gets only 109 unique Ghits. -- Scientizzle 17:43, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. After discounting all the new users and sockpuppets, I found approximately 50-50 consensus to delete the article (I won't go into exact numbers), which is insufficient for deletion. Relisting this AfD won't work, because of the sheer number of !votes made by all the new users and sockpuppets, so any further AfD (to gauge a more accurate consensus) would have to start from scratch. Deathphoenix ʕ 15:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Still in beta testing. No claims of notability. No sign of third-party references. (Fairly well-written, though.) —Wrathchild (talk) 17:46, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ha. CrazyCasey 01:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"We are a website community devoted to literature, Role-playing, and general chat amongst a lively community of friendly people. All are welcome at Amber: writers, gamers, quiz freaks and spammers alike. We also play host to Heaven's Gates : Darkthrone's first clan, who have their own section of the forums."
It's a forum site. There is no evidence that this piece has been published by the university, this site hosts a DT clan. Just because it exists and has been submitted as part of a course doesn't mean that it's anything other than WP:OR.
Even after looking myself and everyone's had time to do the same, not a single piece of anything even remotely connected to establishing notability has surface, despite it repeatedly being said that there has.
Every time I try to look something up on Google I get WP on top of the results. This article claims that Lazarus has done these charity runs - where is the evidence? I'm not seeing any (and I've tried). Where is Lazarus' homepage? There's none listed, again I've looked for it, nothing there. There are plenty of things need verifying, yet precious little to verify them with. It was given a 'please add citations' tag nearly over two months ago, there's a message on the talk page asking for some cites dated the 1st of August. If those actually tending the article can't find anything it's hardly surprising that nothing's come up during the AFD.
The article reads like an advert, even giving details of the IRC, how to log in etc., the web address stuck in amongst the text at the top, plug for Lazarus' charity work in the DT article instead of in the Lazarus article (not that there's any evidence of Lazarus existing beyond DT). There is something VERY wrong with the DT article and the Lazarus article accompanying it, I'm no longer giving it the benefit of the doubt. QuagmireDog 17:46, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We are pleased to announce that, once again, we will be holding a charity drive to support Children's Hospital. Last year we thought it would be a great idea to hold a charity drive and raise money to help those who are sick and less fortunate over the holiday season. Players managed to raise over $10,000.00 for Children's Hospital in New York.
Like last year, players will have the ability to donate via paypal or the mail, and everyone who donates will receive one of three new charity medals that will appear on your profile page. Players will also have the ability to win a variety of prizes which will range from game testing, to console games, dvd's, and more.
To help us announce this year's charity drive, we got Cash Cunningham, the Board Chairman of Children's Hospital to thank players who donated last year and tell you a little about this year's charity drive:
Dear “Dark Throne Players”:
On behalf of the Women & Children’s Hospital of Buffalo, please accept our heartfelt thanks to all of you who went online and made a donation in last year’s charity drive to benefit the hospital. As a group you successful raised $10,363; a portion of which we gave to the Child Life Department to use for the purchase of toys for patients spending their holiday in the hospital. The remainder of your donation went to the help the Hematology/Oncology Unit; a unit which cares for 98% of the patients under the age of four diagnosed with some form of cancer or blood disorder.
We are most appreciative of your efforts on behalf of the young patients we serve and would like to thank you in advance for participation in this year’s charity drive. Please know that by supporting Lazarus Software in their benefit for the hospital you are enabling our doctors, nurses and health care professionals to provide the very best care for the more than 45,000 patients who are treated here each year.
On behalf of the staff at the Women & Children’s Hospital of Buffalo Foundation and our Board of Directors a most heartfelt thank you.
Very truly yours,
Cash Cunningham Board Chairman Women & Children’s Hospital of Buffalo Foundation
For more information about this Hospital and the foundation, please visit http://foundation.wchob.org and look for our official Charity Drive page to go up on Dark Throne very soon. On this page we will be including all of the important information such as mailing addresses, contact information for the hospital, and specifics about how to donate online.
anymore credibility needed to that fact? if so, i am sure a little digging in the archives can bring up some more info. I belive that in the 2005 Charity Drive, a little over $12,500 was raised, but don't hold me to that amount. Phoenix2009 01:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Phoenix200 DT Supporter[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:40, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability for a fan-made Warcraft map. WP:WEB not met. Wikipedia is not a game guide. "Dark Deeds" warcraft -wikipedia gets only 274 unique Ghits. -- Scientizzle 17:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[Dark Deeds Warcraft] gets 153,000 hits and the 2nd top result is the wikipedia page. Also there are several other warcraft 3 custom maps on wikipedia and a category which Dark Deeds is listed under. See Category:Warcraft custom games -- ToastTheif 6:50pm, 25 September 2006 (EST)
The result was speedy keep due to bad faith nom, WP:SNOW, and an AfD determining keep a mere month ago. PT (s-s-s-s) 23:07, 25 September 2006 (UTC) closed as unnecessary duplication of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P-P-P-Powerbook (4th nomination), which is the actual debate here. All relevant comments are moved there. Punkmorten 06:54, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fixing third nomination of this article. No opinion. Previous nominations:
The result was Speedy delete a7 and g1, no assertion of notability and a lot of patent nonsense. NawlinWiki 19:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently a bunch of the stories told by the writer's teacher. Originally listed for speedy deletion as patent nonsense. I had the following conversation with the writer on the page's talk page:
What's your beef? How can you say this is patent nonsense if you don't know who he is?
Alfons, my DT teacher often tells us stories of his life, and has pictures to back his stories up. He also tells us he invented funk in general, however, can't back this up, so i haven't written it. dig?
• A teacher's random stories aren't notable, are unverified, and have no place in an encylopedia. Wikipedia:Patent nonsense. Clamster5 17:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• I beg to differ. He's played a large part in the bass community and the development of slap techniques. They aren't random and are varifiable.
• Then list web sources on the page that reflect that. Unverified and possibly made-up material isn't accepted on wikipedia. Clamster5 17:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• I might add that word of mouth is just as an effective and reliable source of information than any old website. No doubt any sources i give you will be debated for their reliability purely because of the nature of the content.
• I'm going to list this on AFD so you can debate this out with someone else. Clamster5 17:55, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Clamster5 17:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Advertisement for nn web game that was just released today. If the game becomes notable, I'd suggest relisting, but not right now. Wikipedia's not a web hosting service. Wildthing61476 18:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
While I must admit, part of the reason for the post was to draw attention to the game, I do think the code for a Dynamic IP Server is of interest. Is there another article where this code could be placed at least? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.211.51.107 (talk • contribs) .
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant 02:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article appears to be largely hypothetical original research. Aside from this subject's use in fiction, there aren't any sources cited to verify that there is any interest in pursuit of embryo space colonization. -- Malber (talk • contribs) 18:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A biography which would appear to be written by the person themself. Not notable enough really to warrant an article (none of the WP:BIO notability guidelines are met). Thanks/wangi 18:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, musician with no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki 21:47, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn musician. David Mestel(Talk) 18:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Creator requested deletion. ZimZalaBim (talk) 13:18, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Website advertisement with little context. Fails WP:WEB. ZimZalaBim (talk) 18:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:42, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn con-man. - Ektar 18:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Is there an article on "People who allegedly have impersonated celebrities and committed crimes."? (I assume the title would have to be shorter!) This really should go in something like that. Perhaps a series of articles grouped by year or by decade. People tend to remember the name of the person impersonated, not the impersonator, so keeping the article as is really helps no one. RickReinckens 05:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 16:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was prodded and deprodded: while it's possible the school is notable I can't see anything in the article itself to indicate that it is. Mark Grant 18:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A primary school is never notable just by reason of existing, nor even by being verifiable. It must be notable of itself and that notability must be asserted in the article. Every school is not sacred. UK primary schools are ten a penny. This article is linked to by no real article, and has no real content. Fails WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. There are no sources referenced. Note that Oftsed, if cited later as a source, has little relevance, because every UK state sector school has an Ofsted reference. I prodded it. Ironic was the statement when deprodding deprod obviously notable school, since the article has this simple line in it: Lapal Primary School is a primary school which situated in Halesowen, West Midlands, England. That is it. There is no notability. The school just exists. Period. Fiddle Faddle 19:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
An article on a single class at a single law school is not encyclopedically notable. Scientizzle 19:15, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. Alex | talk / review me | 12:38, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what this jumble of words is supposed to be about, but it sounds made up. Prod removed by anons who proceeded to add more nonsense to it. Danny Lilithborne 19:46, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, made-up game. Prod has been removed by the main editor. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Pretty much the same case as the recently deleted "Pringles (game)". Húsönd 19:47, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The account used to create this, User:PWizard seems to have been solely created to add linkspam to the CheatHappens.com site [66]. Is this site notable? Richard W.M. Jones 19:53, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:28, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
unable to specify which Michael oneill it is, published 5 CDs, but none are notable due to independent label Onionmon 20:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article fails WP:WEB. Out of 96 unique web search hits, there is no coverage that would augment what is in the article to satisfy that notability guideline. Prod removed on the basis that I listed the proposed WP:SOFTWARE in addition to indicating that the site was NN -- I'm still not sure what the point was there. Erechtheus 20:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NN band per WP:MUSIC. Contested prod. Barely claims importance at all, but claims to have an album out so I thought speedy was inappropriate. delete. Mangojuicetalk 20:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
why should this article be deleted? i have produced for this band?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Liamgaughan (talk • contribs) .
2. Self-promotion. You are free to write about yourself or projects you have a strong personal involvement in. There! wikipedia says this article can exist!
A7 good point- but then, unremarkable is simply a matter of opinion, isn't it. I'm pretty sure this band are remarkable to some people lol —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.69.94.242 (talk • contribs) .
How about, the day that wikipedia gets desperate for the 300kb or so, of space that this article takes up, they could remove it? ITs not like its a fake band, and its not harming anyone. (liamgaughan) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Liamgaughan (talk • contribs) .
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is redundant and unnecessary, and it has nothing new to offer.Khosrow II 20:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC) Khosrow II 20:43, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Khorshid and other accounts of Khosrow II do you laugh also the article Turko-Iranian? Yes, really LOL -Zaparojdik 26 September 2006 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete G11. - Mailer Diablo 16:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Advertisement —The preceding unsigned comment was added by StopItTidyUp (talk • contribs) .
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:42, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unverifiable and unsourced article about a rapper, who is putting out album in 2008/2010. Crystalballing at best, appears to be NN. Article had been created and deleted via CSD for notability. CSD removed numerous times, requestion deletion/saliting of article. Wildthing61476 21:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 20:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Record label started by Yung Jay (creator of the article) and his cousin Toine - both up for deletion. Has not actually released anything yet. Non-notable. -- RHaworth 21:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy redirect. This stub contains only one sentence, but that sentence tells us exactly what to do here. — CharlotteWebb 23:46, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This college merged with Bluegrass Community and Technical College. I believe delete is the appropriate course, but a case can be made for redirect. Acdixon 21:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect for now, when notability is clearly demonstrated we can give it its own article. Ashibaka tock 17:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
http://searchirc.com/network/chatautism,yearly demonstrates that roughly 40 people use this network, so this is basically like having an article for a single IRC channel. Ashibaka tock 21:20, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep but cleanup. (aeropagitica) 20:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was nomination withdrawn. Whispering(talk/c) 00:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. May be notable, but at this point the article contains no encyclopedic content and is purely POV. Khatru2 21:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)Keep concerns addressed. Khatru2 23:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Luna Santin 03:12, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a not especially notable franchising company. Its also an orphan article. -- Solipsist 21:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is just dead wrong. Put that however you like in terms of it failing WP:BIO, being a WP:HOAX, or the like. The article describes Calvin Johnson (football). Somebody seems to have decided to make a WP:POINT about the use of the citation needed template, so that editor deprodded the article. Erechtheus 22:07, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete as a non-notable group/organisation, as per WP:BIO & WP:CORP. (aeropagitica) 20:01, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested Prod. Article originally said "company", now says "organization". Either way, unable to Verify its existence, much less notability. Google ([69]) only comes up with a few myspace-type pages. -- Fan-1967 22:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Incompletely nom not allowed to run to completion. Somebody must assert a strong reason why we should overturn a twice-AfD'ed article. - CrazyRussian talk/email 22:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Incomplete nom started by Springnuts. No reason given. Yomanganitalk 22:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Witdrawn by nominator. (aeropagitica) 19:58, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
spamvertisement as suggested by another user in the talk page. I'm biased a bit to keep it for undisclosed reasons. But I'm nominating it for deletion for the good of wikipedia, because it is still unencyclopedic. Please include all pages that are merely redirects to this page. Thanks! zephyr2k 22:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Other pages nominated:
John Miguel Jr
Sample redirects:
Alfa Capili found in John Miguel Jr redirects to BAO Team
Timothy Joseph Cruz found in John Miguel Jr redirects to BAO Team
Nestor Maningding Jr found in John Miguel Jr redirects to BAO Team
Galo Matagay III found in John Miguel Jr redirects to BAO Team
Ryan Tuaño found in John Miguel Jr redirects to BAO Team
Evilhero found in BAO Team and John Miguel Jr redirects to BAO Team
Deletion again??? BAO Team represents the hacking/carding culture in the Philippines. How come some of you posted that this is just a little IRC war. How come warez/hacking groups are welcome here? Zaphyr damn it! YOU are a Filipino. If there's something wrong why don't you just edit it. Are you related with User: Mike Abundo? If so, I supposed you just like to sabotage or retaliate. or Mark Cacho (user: kurenai jiku)? the alleged carder.
The result was delete. Luna Santin 03:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable radio station; prod removed without comment. Valrith 22:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete as a ((hoax)) with a chain mail as a source and the first Google hit being a link to the same article, it is highly unlikely that Cliff Burton would be remembered in this way without some official source acknowledging the day. (aeropagitica) 19:56, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a non-notable event. 3 search engine hits do nothing to document the celebration of this anniversary. What happened to Cliff Burton is very sad, but it is well documented in other places. If there was some indication that this weren't just something made up in school one day, perhaps a redirect to the song article would be appropriate. As it is, this doesn't appear to be a search term. Erechtheus 22:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 16:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A rather lengthy and pointless list that clearly shows bias. The fact that there are (Deceased) tags after many of the people listed are clear signs that someone is trying to discourage smoking. This information is irrelevant to the list itself. It also contains some people who are obviously not "iconic". Who decides what is "iconic"? The list clearly needs major revision and possible deletion. GShton 22:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep after a rewrite. Daniel.Bryant 02:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, advert. Cordless Larry 22:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep now that the article has been substantially improved. (aeropagitica) 19:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like nothing more than advertising. Gnusmas 22:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:42, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:SOFTWARE and WP:WEB. Jeff Silvers 22:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Luna Santin 03:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a vanity article.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ers00 (talk • contribs) .
"Vanity information is considered to be any information...that might create an apparent conflict of interest, meaning any material that presents the appearance of being intended to in any way promote the personal notoriety of the author, or one of the close family members or associates of the author."
"...if [the vanity information constitutes] an entire article, the article is then usually submitted for deletion. ... Those that offer some claim of notability, however remote, are usually sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion."
"Even in the cases of decidedly famous people, these people's unrealized aspirations, thoughts, and hobbies are seldom included in Wikipedia, unless they are directly salient, and, more importantly, verifiable. Wikipedia's policy on verifiability prohibits the inclusion of things that are not verifiable from independent sources."
"...the best rule of thumb while determining whether or not any such edits may contain vanity materials, is to ask oneself, "Would this same type of material normally be found in a print encyclopedia?""
Do you still disagree that this is a vanity article? Ers00 22:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It is written a bit vanity-like, but de Grazia is (was, as of Aug. 31) a thinker who was published in scholarly magazines, and who published his own journal, backed by no less an authority than SAGE Publications. Besides, he's fascinating. Keep it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susan Stanich (talk • contribs) 16:32, 28 September 2006
The result was Speedily deleted for no notability, no content, and no context. Also, the only author of the page nominated it on AfD. Not sure why, but it seems to count as a deletion request by the only editor. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:37, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
About an infamous club Nathannoblet 00:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]