The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:43, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Living Under Drones (academic study)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about an academic study. The Wikipedia page Drone attacks in Pakistan is dedicated to the subject of the study. The article should be incorporated as a reference into that page. Skcpublic (talk) 02:26, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the main article on drone attacks in Pakistan. In fact, this would be more appropriate as a source for that article and nothing more, though there are a few sentences here that might be worth keeping (in the main article). MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Drone attacks in Pakistan; subject of this AfD does not appear to have received significant coverage in multiple non-primary reliable sources. Study is related to a notable subject, and would fall within its scope, as such a merger and redirect is a good solution that doesn't involve outright deletion.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:28, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the article title isn't useful as a redirect. For those advocating a merge, what material do you believe is suitable for a merge? -- Whpq (talk) 16:49, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable in and of itself; unlikely redirect name; nothing worth merging. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:32, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.