- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk 04:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Little Eucharistic Brothers of Divine Will[edit]
- Little Eucharistic Brothers of Divine Will (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This may not be a hoax, but it is hard to see how these two men with their 8 cows is notable, even if it a real religious order. The article implies there are more than 2 men, but one of the sources says 2 men. Grahame (talk) 06:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 06:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Maybe one day... not today. No sources worth any kind of notability are available in my search. Lourdes 07:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Yes, this microscopic group, or couple, exists. The two of them. Plus, maybe a third in the minor leagues. "The other day we had six hours of adoration to pray for rain because the farmers were desperate. A few days later – it rained." Utterly non-notable. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete By far too little for notability. Aoziwe (talk) 12:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:09, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:09, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, but they've got moos!, yes coola moos are great but that doesn't make the subject notable, okaaayyy, i suppose its a delete then, as it doesn't meet WP:GNG and there aren't any useable sources available, (if only there was a wikiarticle on "list of religious groups with
moos cattle"...)
Coolabahapple (talk) 04:30, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.