The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

List of recent automobile models by type[edit]

List of recent automobile models by type (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

• Delete. "Recent" is subjective. Doczilla (talk) 13:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete - yes it is, and the list doesn't serve a valid encyclopedic purpose. PrinceGloria (talk) 14:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Comment It is encyclopedic, but it's also already covered by the category Lists of automobiles, and even defining "recent" as "current" won't change that. Mandsford (talk) 18:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete agree with all above Doc Strange (talk) 18:55, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per Doczilla and Mandsford. The article is subjective and redundant due to "Lists of automobiles". 1ForTheMoney (talk) 20:41, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete - ditto Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 10:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per all. Subjetive and redundant, failed copy of List of automobiles. Zerokitsune (talk) 03:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Comment: I don't think this list is covered by Lists of automobiles, it is (should be) part of that parent list. At least, we could move it to the WikiProject:Automobiles, right? I find it useful to look for similar and related cars. The Spanish-language Wikipedia has a similar list but classified as an appendix rather than an article. -- NaBUru38 (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request clarification. I think I've missed something, but I see nothing in Lists of automobiles that remotley resembles this list, the closest I can find is Car classification, which of course only lists a few examples, and Category:Car classifications, and lists and categories are not mutually exclusive, so can someone tell me where this article is duplicated in list form as seems to be being asserted above? MickMacNee (talk) 22:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note the I have significantly edited the List of automobiles article mentioned above, the version I found and refered to above is this one. MickMacNee (talk) 00:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep, but Rename or Merge. The list is an extensive piece of information and should not be deleted. I have a problem with the words "current" and "recent", but we should change the words instead of deleting the whole article. Perhaps, it could be merged with Car classification.147.175.98.213 (talk) 00:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.