The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of people with two or more professions[edit]

Indiscriminate information and loosely associated topics. Arnold Schwarzenegger is an actor and also Governor of California... Arthur Conan Doyle was a writer and also a medical doctor. Where's the connection between those two people? They've had other jobs, so what? Original research needed here as only people with another "notable" profession are included, but it isn't clear which professions are notable and which aren't. Saikokira 23:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete This is an awful idea for an article... I propose its deletion, as well as the possible comphiscation and repeated sledge-hammering of the author(s) personal computers. Bad, bad page. †Ðanieltiger45† ^{Talk to me} 23:44, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete, totally impossible to verify. Totally pointless. Non-notable juncture. And can I do the hammering? (Sorry, had to say it...) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 00:07, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
speedy delete as being against everything we're not against. A beautiful example of "a list of indiscriminate information". AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 00:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No speedy criterion fits. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 00:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ... in agreement that this violates WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE in having far too broad of inclusion criteria. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:04, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as useless and indiscriminate list. It is better in an category instead, since it would be more maintainable. --JForget 01:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete List of loosely associated items Corpx 04:58, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see a snowball rolling here... all of us have had different roles in our lifetimes. Mandsford 22:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, go home, change clothes, go somewhere else, and then Remove too. ←Ben^B4 06:27, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --PEAR (talk) 10:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete JJ Williams 20:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteBalloonman 16:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, what a total fucking joke who thought of this list? Burntsauce 17:39, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Not completely useless, but is totally unsourced. Make a Category per JForget. Bearian 19:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.