The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete as fancruft. Royboycrashfan 12:35, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a article. This is merely a list of terms gathered cohesively on a document. Delete cruft. ZeroTalk 04:18, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fancruft TKE 04:21, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a Prima Guide. --Icarus 05:31, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above, that said, most of the material could go in the Soul Calibur articles ⇒SWATJesterReadyAimFire! 05:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 07:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as gamecruft. This is of no interest at all to anyone who doesn't actively play Soul Calibur. JIP | Talk 09:33, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Icarus. And because it is the only sane thing to do with this: you either know it already or you don't need to. Just zis Guy you know? 15:36, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Transwiki. This would make sense in context of a game guide, so putting it in a wikibooks game guide for soul calibur would work. Night Gyr 17:30, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Command throw air control quick roll frame trap crouch dash soul charge ring out tier whiff summon suffering calamity symphony just impact delete. Fagstein 18:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:NOT explicitly rules out articles like this. Pity, it's not a bad sort of list, and would go well somewhere else. Stevage 16:27, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.