This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 02:17, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lissaexplains.com[edit]

Vanity website page. Andrew pmk | Talk 21:12, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - non-notable vanity. It's er, not very well designed, is it? Rob Church ^{Talk | Desk} 21:15, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Paulexplains.com. Paul Klenk 21:28, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete though it is a slightly popular website- I've at least heard of it. In any event, non-notable for WP purposes. ral315 21:56, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete; non-notable, though I've heard of it too. Jaxl | talk 22:28, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep (I knew I should have looked it up...) Jaxl | talk 03:06, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Over a hundred thousand Google hits suggests some notability. Denni☯ 02:55, 2005 August 29 (UTC)
• Keep. It's a well known, notable website that's been around for years. HollyAm 04:24, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Does not meet deletion criteria. Trollderella 09:20, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Notable and well known site. - Mike "Mig" 23:49, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A very well known site. - Joe "Joe" 24:32, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.