- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Dalton Maag. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Lexia (typeface) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG, I can't find any coverage of this font. Note that this is font is apparently unrelated to Lexia Readable, subject of for example this PC World review, which was previously deleted. Lennart97 (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Dalton Maag, where it is mentioned. Basic facts about the typeface are verifiable, but I don't see any in depth reviews that would bring it to GNG. It is a plausible search term, so a reasonable alternative to deletion would be a redirect to Dalton Maag, the foundry where it was created. An alternative would to a redirect to its creator Ron_Carpenter_(designer)#Fonts, but the foundry article seems more informative. --
((u|Mark viking)) {Talk} 20:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or redirect as above. After 21 years, never became notable by itself. W Nowicki (talk) 00:00, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.