- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sources are apparently not substantial enough per discussion Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:26, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Kosbit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly-sourced article about a three year old IT company. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH for lack of independent reliable sources. - MrX 18:04, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 18:12, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 18:12, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:57, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as corporate spam with content such as:
- IT solutions and managed services to reduce Information Communication Technology (ICT) cost and improve service delivery!
- Wikipedia is not a free means of promotion or a replacement for a company web site. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:37, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No notability per WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 23:50, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as the page in question is that of a million dollar company. It fits notability. How old a company or organization is cannot be a criterion for deletion. The sources are reliable too. Page further edited after being tagged.Akgeorge (talk) 15:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Not a particularly notable company. Sources often list the company or mention it as one of several companies in an article, and as such the page does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH imo.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:23, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails GNG, reference (including the ones listed by Akgeorge above) fail WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND and fail the criteria for establishing notability. -- HighKing++ 20:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.