The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:QUORUM (I have disregarded SwisterTwister's !vote as the argument is not clear). Closing in favour of delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Khalil Salem Sugui[edit]

Khalil Salem Sugui (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. No suitable coverage online found via Google. Every one of the online sources given in the article is either a dead end, a work by him or associated with him, a passing mention, or else has no mention of him at all. —Largo Plazo (talk) 00:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - virtually nothing about this person on any of the search engines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:32, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for now at best if the article is still questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 02:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.