The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Almost no one has chimed in their opinions on the article. It is quite obvious that even after 2 relists, there is no consensus and relisting it for a third time would just be a waste of time. Thus, this is closed as no consensus with WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kathryn Knuttila[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Knuttila was Miss Minnesota, but this alone is not enough to establish notability. The article only has one source that is independent but is just providing local coverage. I was able to find a few more local sources in my google search, but all connected to the Miss Minnesota win. I was also able to find a picture and caption from the Orlando Sentinel but that does not amount to indepth coverage. There is no coverage of Knuttila outside of this one event and no reason why we should have an article on her. John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep WP:NPASR or Wrong venue Notability is not by itself an argument for deletion for this topic. I don't think that anyone cares enough to do the work to merge even if they think the topic is non-notable, so default to speedy keep, no argument for deletion. See WP:IGNORINGATD, WP:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion, and WP:Deletion policy#CONTENT. Unscintillating (talk) 00:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.