The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:31, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Warner[edit]

Josh Warner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

The article fails WP:BIO. The tone of the article is autobiographical and provides little independant references to verify claims. Subject does not appear to be the subject of an independant biography nor have multiple features in credible news media. A quick google search turns up lots of Josh Warners, but this article seems to be the only one about this particular artist. So it is not likely that the subject has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. There is also little or no mention of significant awards. The article is very promotional in tone with little real verifiable content about the subject. Since the article also discusses the subject's business, the article should meet WP:CORP. Given the lack of references, it seems safe to assume that the company has not been the subject of secondary sources. The article appears very promotional in tone. Delete TheRingess (talk) 23:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - with no references this is entirely original research, so it's gotta go. the_undertow ^talk 23:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, created by single-purpose account Shaunco (talk · contribs), so high WP:COI spidey-sense here. vanispamcruftisement at its best. --Dhartung | Talk 05:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Delete on the present information. it seems odd that a producer of custom jewelry for the market described would not have some articles of reviews in standard media, and not prejudice against re-insertion if they ever appear. DGG 06:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.