The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As to weather this article is a copyright violation or not is a different thing and will be duly addressed. (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jamil Molaeb[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article lacks citations altogether. None of the material in the article is sourced, meaning its content was likely created by the person himself. A Google search turns up a series of self-promotional articles and quotes, an excerpt from a city guidebook for Beirut, Twitter, Instagram, etc. Article needs evidence of in-depth interest by independent reliable sources in order to be retained. These were not forthcoming. KDS4444^Talk 06:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 12:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 12:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article is fixable and the subject matter is very well known regionally. I will add citations in time -~ Elias Z. (talkallam) 06:30, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 20:53, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep as this seems somewhat convincing and may need familiar attention for better improvements. SwisterTwister talk 23:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've blanked this article and listed it at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2016 February 3. Two previous versions of it was speedied as copyright violations, and while some attempts have been made to rewrite this version it's still rather too close to the source. It may well be salvageable with further rewrites or removals. Hut 8.5 22:17, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.