The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 15:54, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Intelliquip[edit]

Intelliquip (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I previously PRODed this article but overlooked that it had already been done back in 2008. The rationale was "fails the notability guideline for companies." – Teratix ₵ 14:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 14:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 14:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 14:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: An article about a product/company (now acquired by another company, about which there is no article, so no redirect option). References to routine product and commercial announcements fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. My searches are not finding the coverage needed to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 09:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:27, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete promotionalism and non-notable . the article starts out with the broadest claims "Intelliquip, LLC develops browser-based software also known as the Intelligent Front-End." but it turns out to be specialized to "automate the front-end sales process" "for the fluid handling equipment industry and is compatible with pumps, compressors, valves, blowers, turboexpanders, heat exchangers, actuators, filters, seals, couplings, motors, and variable-frequency drives". Too narrow a niche. DGG ( talk ) 19:45, 28 October 2020 (UTC) �[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.