The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:21, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ietsism[edit]

Ietsism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism. I've searched and failed to find any significant coverage of this term in independent reliable sources (even Dutch ones). I've also checked the corresponding articles on foreign-language Wikipedias; nothing there either. (The best was a one-word mention in this article [1].) On the talk page a merge has been suggested; but with a complete lack of sources and no evidence that this is a notable term, I think the article should simply be deleted as original research. Robofish (talk) 21:45, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:34, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.