The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Home Security Store[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Before I made the last edits, it was largely an advertisement for the company, which doesn't seem appropriate for Wikipedia. Almost all of the citations were from the company's web sites and press releases (and those pages are no longer there anyway). About a year ago, the company changed hands, which made most of the content of the page no longer valid. I trimmed the page down to the essentials of the company,but I see little purpose for the page. Rockhead17 (talk) 05:52, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The discussion was created without the ((afd2)) template and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I offer no opinion on the nomination itself at this time. --Finngall ^talk 15:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there are no signs of better company notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I see some press releases. The only reliable source I can find is the article on cepro which reports the store's closure and the website's changeover. I'm not sure this would pass WP:CORP; it doesn't seem to pass GNG. BusterD (talk) 02:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.