The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Raj Comics. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 23:53, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Goldheart[edit]

Goldheart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsure what this is trying to say. Seems like it can be redirected to the name of the company and also has a opinion of the comic instead of it being about the comics. Either delete, userfy or redirect. Wgolf (talk) 18:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:24, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Raj Comics. Not sure that there's really significant coverage of this character. However, it's entirely possible that there are non-English sources available for use, so I think a redirect would be better than deletion. Plus, it seems like it might be a useful search term for fans of the comics. Judging by results on Google News, Raj Comics itself looks quite notable, but I'm unconvinced about their individual superheroes. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.