The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. NORTH AMERICA1000 09:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ghayal Once Again

[edit]
Ghayal Once Again (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film not yet in principal photography, per WP:NOTFILM. GoldenRing (talk) 06:28, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete. Who told you that Ghayal Once Again is "not yet in principal photography"? I can provide you some links where you will find "on set pictures and news" of the film. Here they are:

except these there is many more sites in the internet which can provide you more news and pictures from the set. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taniya94 (talk • contribs) 07:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies - the nomination was based on my reading of the sources in the article. The Times of India source you quote above clearly contradicts my nomination. Someone please close this as withdrawn. GoldenRing (talk) 07:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More