The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 05:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

George Cabot Lee[edit]

Being the father of someone notable doesn't confer notability. According to his obit (it's accessible via the PDF link) and a 1931 Time Article that mentions him very briefly, among other coverage, there doesn't appear to be any indication that he's notable Travellingcari (talk) 22:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable. My initial thought was to merge him into his daughter's article, but I'd even be willing to discuss deleting her article, since she wasn't even a First Lady. Corvus cornix_talk 22:58, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Never thought I'd see a NYT obit as evidence of non-notability, but there it is. Jfire (talk) 23:07, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable. Macy's 123 ^{(review me)} 23:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Alice Hathaway Lee Roosevelt should not even have a stand-alone article, let alone her father. Delete both and merge into Theodore Roosevelt somehow. (Mind meal (talk) 02:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.