The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Bad faith nom. Nom apparently made in good faith, but with bad timing. Smashville^talk 14:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fairmount Cemetery[edit]

Fairmount Cemetery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This is a disambiguation for a cemetery in which only one blue-linked article exists along with a red-link. Even if both were blue, it should be handled with headnotes. See WP:DISAMBIG. This should be a routine housekeeping matter. However, it was created by a serial creator of inappropriate disambiguation pages and it is going to take weeks to go through them all. Delete Drawn Some (talk) 05:49, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like you are doing more wikistalking. Cheers. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 05:51, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep As the stalkee or "serial creator of inappropriate disambiguation pages" in this and several other AFDs over the past days. User:Drawn Some appears to be trying to punish me for refuting his arguments at the bilateral relations AFDs. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 06:55, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Two are currently blue links, and neither one is obviously more important than the other, so a dab page seems reasonable to me. (Yes, the article on the Newark cemetery is longer at the moment, but the Denver cemetery seems to have some historical significance, as well. [1]) Zagalejo^^^ 06:50, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Wow. I mean Keep. Per Wikipedia:Disambiguation, this is exactly what the page should look like. I'm quite stunned this was nominated actually. -- Banjeboi 08:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - its a dab page, its needed. I thought that was basic. Patchy1Talk To Me! 10:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Benji. Crafty (talk) 11:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Snowball keep per all the above. This is one of multiple articles started by Richard Arthur Norton and nominated for deletion by Drawn Some. The two have some sort of dispute. --Explodicle (T/C) 13:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.