The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Quarl (talk) 2007-02-19 12:28Z

Exclusive Analysis[edit]

Exclusive Analysis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Recreated speedy. Article asserts notability but is very spammy. Seeing what the wider community thinks. -- Steel 00:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Simply having their work published isn't enough. We need someone (multiple people, actually) to have published stuff on them (i.e. multiple external sources). -- Steel 01:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.