The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 06:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Etana (musician)[edit]

Notability in regard to WP:MUSIC appears to be less than marginal; the lack of independent references does not help. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:34, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 21:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, passes WP:MUSIC#C9, [1]. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 23:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Concur with Gibb. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. C9 requires a "major" music competition, and the ref provided by Gibb refers to a local awards show (in fact, it says it will change the face of the local entertainment scene. If someone can provide a reference that the award is "major", i'm willing to change my vote. - Philippe 19:55, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
:I guess it is all a matter of perspective. This appears to be a major competition on Jamaica, but not necessarily internationally. Given that it is a major one in a country, I'm inclined to keep it. Counterpoint? — BQZip01 — ^talk 21:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:MUSIC by a mile. JeanLatore (talk) 01:02, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:28, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep even outside of the EME, the fact that her album's #12 on the billboard reggae charts[2] right now makes it an easy keep. Vickser (talk) 01:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~. No references to prove any of the assertions made in the article. The claims may meet WP:MUSIC, but the article itself fails WP:BLP. BradV 01:28, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Keep per User:Vickser, although article is in desperate need of a rewrite (and some sources!). BradV 01:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.