The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per sk1 & all that (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 03:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Blackery

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With services existing to increase subscriber and view counts, does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Almost all sources are self-published. Padenton (talk) 02:22, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator― Padenton |☎ 03:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - tremendous failure of WP:BEFORE. [1] is a major piece about her, and she verifiably has charted singles, thus very clearly meeting WP:NMUSIC's second criteria. There's also some coverage by RockSound, although I don't know how reliable they are. There is also [2], [3] as well. Not sure where the "With services existing to increase subscriber and view counts" comes in to play, because Blackery clearly meets GNG and NMUSIC. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 02:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep per Luke and per these sources [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].... Yeah BEFORE wasn't even followed at all, Clearly meets GNG and meets NMUSIC, There are plenty of sources on Google News and probably alot more on other news sites as well. –Davey2010^Talk 02:52, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep does appear to be appropriate now. VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:46, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.