The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Waggers (talk) 13:11, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Emirates Lounge[edit]

As a stand-alone article in mainspace articles have to fulfill certain policies, such as WP:V. As an unsourced article, with no references which discuss Emirates Lounge in an in-depth, non-promotional manner, this article fails WP:V. If an article split is required due to cruft in the main article, options that editors have include editing the article to make it more encyclopaedic, and removing cruft, not creating a separate article for it, particularly when it does include a single reference that gives it an ounce of notability in an encyclopaedic context. An additional reason that can used for this article is WP:NOT#GUIDE. Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 18:57, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looks to be a WP:ADVERT case. Nsk92 (talk) 00:09, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.