The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; note also that Google provides few relevant results [1]. Heimstern Läufer 20:36, 15 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - All reasons above, plus there might be copyvio issues in the text. --J Morgan(talk) 20:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do NOT Delete - links to online versions of newspaper reviews added. There are no copyright issues --Pmichelini 22:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Revert to this revision. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC) Hardly worth doing that actually, as the redirect was only used in one article and I've just changed it. So go ahead and delete per nom. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.