The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. causa sui (talk) 20:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Elijah Daniel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the reasonably reliable sources mention him, the rest are twitter type. Under the best of circumstances, it would be a BLP1E issue, but I don't see how it even qualifies there. Not notable, vanity piece. Dennis Brown (talk) 19:52, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This man is not notable enough to need an article and it was almost certainly written by the man himself. 75.69.46.238 (talk) 23:58, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't meet notability guidelines, pretty obvious vanity account ChaosEmerald 00:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChaosE (talk • contribs)

Delete fails to meet notablity guidelines. May also fail on other grounds.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:10, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Σ τ c. 03:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.