The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yuser31415 00:36, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EA_Sports_F1_Series[edit]

I started to edit this page for style, grammar, spelling, nonsense, lack of citations, etc. but it quickly became clear that if I carried on, there would be nothing left. It really doesn't look like an encyclopedia article to me, more like the sort of fan reviews you see on sites like Gamespot or IGN. M0thr4 15:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep but does need cleanup and will probably end up a lot shorter � Qxz 19:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
keep notable video game. the idea that it has minimal real content does not mean that the article could not be significantly expanded. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:58, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Genuine notable puslished games. Quality of article doesnt change that.--Dacium 22:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notable video game. Article cleanup is not a reason for deletion. -- Whpq 22:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and sweep. It's a work in progress, any faults can be knocked out as it's worked on. The fact that all games of the series are in one place is even better in terms of clean-up - there's only one article to chew at instead of five. Good faith nom, but suggest WP:SNOW as this can and will be cleaned-up over time. QuagmireDog 01:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.