The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 02:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daweda Exchange[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company launched a year ago, with no indication yet of notability per WP:CORP, and no significant coverage online from WP:RS, just lots of press releases and some mentions on finance blogs. The PR tends to claim that it's the "world's first" at what it does, but HedgeStreet was first, in 2004. Wikishovel (talk) 10:16, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 10:17, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 10:17, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as corpspam, created by Cyprus binary options SPA, noting that the existing refs are extraordinary weak and no further refs are found using standard WP:BEFORE. The best existing ref is from Arab News and it appears that about half of the words are an interview with the CEO, and the rest are uncritical recitation of possible corp propaganda like "100% uptime". Also noting that one of the other sources is financemagnates.com, which has been impeached at RSN. - Brianhe (talk) 20:46, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not finding evidence of notability. Coretheapple (talk) 22:25, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment see also WP:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Binary options churn continues Wikishovel (talk) 07:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can't find anything about this company that looks even vaguely like a reliable third-party source. Just junk on binary option promotion sites. John Nagle (talk) 05:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.