The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:28, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Crowdbands[edit]

Crowdbands (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails wp:org. Most references and external links are dead. The surviving references hardly constitute independent significant coverage and are basically announcements of what the company intended to achieve. It seems that nothing materialized. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 23:55, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 23:55, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:32, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The coverage is essentially launch PR. There’s a fair amount of it but it’s not in depth coverage. Not sure how long the venture lasted but it didn’t seem to leave much of a mark. Mccapra (talk) 23:45, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is basically promotion, and the available coverage amounts to churnalism. PepperBeast (talk) 15:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.