The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW keep. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience ^t 02:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congregation Solel[edit]

Congregation Solel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Onel5969 (talk) 17:19, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. As sources verify (although some of them are paywalled), this congregation is notable as an early example of the havurah-based synagogue model, its civil rights activism, and as the early-career home of Arnold Jacob Wolf and Lawrence Kushner. Examples: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] --Arxiloxos (talk) 21:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep based on notability established by the reliable sources in the article and those ample additional sources listed above. Alansohn (talk) 02:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Snow Keep. Meets GNG. Per the above.

I note this nom is also attempting to delete a number of other synagogue articles, which also appear to have the requisite coverage. See the 5-top-listed articles nominated by him, today, here. (I'm commenting on similar AfD nominations today by nom that suffer from the same malady; I'm not saying that nom acted in bad faith - just that he is seeking today to delete five synagogue articles on the same unwarranted basis). Epeefleche (talk) 02:28, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Snow Keep. Meets WP:GNG. Even a blue-linked rabbi.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:47, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedily keep per current sources and WP:GNG.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.