This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2008 August 9. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was I note the result of the Deletion Review in respect of the previous AfD listing, but this decision is not binding on this discussion, which would in that case be without purpose. In the discussion contained here, I have considered the arguments on both sides, and the consensus is clear for delete. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 17:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to fail WP:CORP. ScienceApologist (talk) 03:36, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The previous closing of this AfD was considered at Deletion Review and it was determined to be out-of-process. The discussion is being relisted as a result. The closing summary has been converted to a struck through comment below. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 22:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]