The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

City View Center[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBUILD. This article is about a "Mall" in Ohio that was closed down, there is no point of significance for the article to exist. I couldn't find any reliable sources for it to establish notability. Daiyusha (talk) 18:12, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Qualitist (talk) 19:55, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Qualitist (talk) 19:56, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Poorly written article that completely lacks proper sourcing.TH1980 (talk) 02:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. If you couldn't find any reliable sources, you weren't looking very hard. - Eureka Lott 04:42, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:17, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - A WP:BEFORE found sources. Added sources into article. Pass WP:GNG. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:11, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:04, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sufficient sources to satisfy WP:GNG, WP:NBUILD.--Pontificalibus 14:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A literal dead mall which died after three years due to incredible municipal and developer incompetence is definitely notable; writing needs a good fixing up, but definitely not deletion. Nate • (chatter) 05:32, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to article on Garfield Heights, Ohio. In the long span of history this place is not worth a seperate article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:54, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep Sources in the article make the subject meet WP:GNG 89ezagonoszkommunistanacionalista64 (talk) 16:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC) — 89ezagonoszkommunistanacionalista64 (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of 123Aristotle (talk • contribs). [reply]

Keep There are many things that can be added, such as the fact it's literally sinking into the ground, and it was built on top of a landfill that methane is leaking out of. Almy (talk) 20:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.