The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MuZemike 22:38, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cinemash[edit]

Cinemash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inconsistent article. At first WP:NEO would apply, as it defines a WP:NN neologism. But as you read on, the article seems to become advertising for a webshow. I say delete per WP:NOTADVERTISING. - RUL3R^*trolling_*vandalism 21:45, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:07, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I don't see how any of the references relate to this concept. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 15:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I agree with both the nom and Blanchardb. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 06:29, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.