The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Choa Chu Kang Mega Playground

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Unreferenced, and tagged as such for 10 years. It appears to be just a WP:MILL playground. Satellite image shows a couple of courts and some grass. Very routine. MB 02:50, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. MB 02:50, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:36, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No assertion or evidence of notability for routine green area, certainly doesn't appear "mega". Reywas92^Talk 05:55, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Mccapra (talk) 15:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG. --qedk (t 桜 c) 18:23, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article, the subject is not notable really and also it fails GNG.Forest90 (talk) 18:12, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. - MA Javadi (talk) 17:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.