The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete -- Samir धर्म 06:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chandra Costello[edit]

nn model Burgwerworldz 23:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 11:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A wholly absurd and even cheeky riposte. Laziness has nothing to do with the inherent notability of someone with a history of securing bit parts such as Juggy dancer. How, exactly, do you see all that hard work you are calling for pay off when the subject itself simply falls below the notability threshold? Or are there facets of Man Show juggy dancing that we should pull up our sleeves to uncover? Eusebeus 18:12, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes evidently. She gets 500 Google hits and under her alternate name "Shawnie Costello" gets 2500. That's enough for me. Wjhonson 19:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The filmography speaks for itself. Yes it does -- and it says "set decoration", not "acting", are the talents she was hired for. --Calton | Talk 02:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Which do not in themselves mean she is non-notable. ... One more Google datum: "Costello twins" gets over 12,000 hits. -- JHunterJ 13:00, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Counting Ghits is not research. Unless there is something which either or both have done other than being props, please don't keep it to yourself ;-) Ohconfucius
Ghits are data, though. No original research allowed. :-) See new comment below. -- JHunterJ 13:57, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.