The result was Keep, nominator now no longer wants deletion and there are no other delete opinions. (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 22:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I originally mistakenly deleted this as an A7, no assertion of notability. An editor drew my attention to a link to a Forbes.com article about the subject, which serves as the sole claim to notability. This site has an Alexa ration in the 8,000s. Most of the results for the site that I found while Googling appear to be advertisements. WP:NOTABLE states that if a news item is used to establish notability, it requires "Significant coverage" and "it takes more than just a short burst of news reports about a single event or topic to constitute evidence of sufficient notability". If this is a real site that meets WP:WEB, then addressing these should be trivial. CHAIRBOY (☎) 20:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't quarrel with WP's guidelines. Despite the lack of news coverage, however, centsports is certainly notable. If nothing else their web-traffic should really speak for itself. They are the type of website that seasoned web users know to do a bit more research on. Wikipedia has assumed the role of default encyclopedia for many people, and in keeping with its mission of remaining a living, breathing and evolving database it should accept centsports. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.218.218.80 (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]