The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 17:31, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cathy Yanni[edit]

Cathy Yanni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single trade ref used to establish bona fides is insufficient. No coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. scope_creep^Talk 09:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:19, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:19, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 15:52, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This person has had a notable career that has helped the development of the alternative dispute resolution across state lines for issues such as the Opioid epidemic and the Camp Fire. I've pulled from several trade publications such as Chambers and Partners, The National Law Journal, cases from United States district courts and a notable case that was reported on the The Washington Post ^{User talk:ether161}

It is a WP:BLP and the first four reference are made of three legal documents and a Washington Post article that doesn't mention the lady. The next four references are also legal documents. The article needs biographical references that prove WP:V that the person is notable, sufficient to satisfy WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. At the moment there is not ONE reference on the page that can do that. scope_creep^Talk 06:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This is basically a resume of cases on which this subject has worked, no differently than any others in the broad field. BD2412 T 03:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As per BD2412. 1292simon (talk) 08:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:21, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.