The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Cbrown1023 00:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CastlevaniaRL[edit]

CastlevaniaRL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

There are no assertions of notability, fails WP:SOFTWARE and WP:V. As much as I personally might enjoy pluming the occasional Rogue-like, there's no reason for this to have an article. Might deserve mention in the Rogue-like article. Lankybugger 16:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• del a nonnotable "homebrew game" `'mikka 18:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 21:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• delete per above. — brighterorange (talk) 22:32, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I agree with Lankybugger, might deserve a mention in rouge-like (but even then saying that it is notable because it is aimed at less hardcore audience isn't a reason for notability) but an article is too much.Da Big Bozz 21:41, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable home-brew game (probably in violation of the Castlevania copyright). --Alan Au 19:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.