The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 02:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. She's had lots of modeling and acting work, so I'd say she's 'notable'. MikeH411 06:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Due to a lack of information, this page should be deleted.MgHoneyBee 01:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I wonder what the fuss is about. The article has enough information in the way of filmography to deserve the stub template. If anyone feels otherwise then he should only try to add more info, not ask for its deletion. Unitedroad 14:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE or REDIRECT I have to disagree with you. It seems like her filmography is all extras or stand-ins which don't really make her a film star, just an extra.Why don't you try and add to it since you want to keep this page but if you can't the page should be deleted.Just because she's been in some magazines doesn't mean she needs a page.Also I don't know anyone who remebers her from WEdding Crashers.Sorry.MgHoneyBee 18:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
COMMENT Well your second entry to the vote should be comment not a another delete vote. You probably have alot more experience on WP so probably it might not seem very proper to you that I said this but I have no intention of offending you, just felt I should tell you. Unitedroad 07:26, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.