The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - Peripitus (Talk) 08:44, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Byzantine rhetoric[edit]

Byzantine rhetoric (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete unsourced oneliner with minimal context and virtually no content. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:43, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no sources. WillOakland (talk) 21:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Ron B. Thomson (talk) 21:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The article is a tiny stub, but that's not a deletion criteria. It satisfies WP:N and WP:V, with 462 Google books hits, including many that show clearly non-trivial discussions of the term. I've added one reference to the article resulting from seeing this AfD; it's not a topic I'd usually edit, but I figured it would be a good idea to provide some context showing that it is a term discussed in scholarly literature. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 06:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Informative, sourced stub on a notable topic in a notable ancient civilisation. Possibly merge to a suitable article until there's some more content.  Sandstein  23:12, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• keep. It's a notable subject, and there is a source now. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:11, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.