The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Spitz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see enough coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO, only a single passing mention in the Boston Globe. I added that, but the article has been otherwise unsourced for seven years and ten months. joe decker ^{talk to me} 17:19, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 June 10. Snotbot t • c » 02:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The subject of the article seems to be active, but isn't getting the non-trivial coverage required to establish notability. #10 of WP:MUSICBIO may apply, but I couldn't find any sources for the claims in the article--William Thweatt ^Talk | ^Contribs 04:10, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →B music ian 02:46, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.