The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Cbrown1023 02:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boxx[edit]

Boxx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

NN-programing language, PROD removed by article creator delete Cornell Rockey 15:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD and cleanup tags removed from article by article creator Cornell Rockey 16:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No references, fails WP:V and WP:RS. Argyriou (talk) 19:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete listed references don't cover the article subject. Still no evidence of notability. Eluchil404 09:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Article might be worth keeping if it could explain its importance better. Agree with the comments above about lack of WP:RS and WP:V. Is the language (a) already great, just not widely known, or (b) the germ of something better? After reading the article, I have no idea. EdJohnston 20:10, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.