The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation due to the low level of participation in the debate. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 09:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BIRDZ[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources to establish notability per WP:GNG. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:50, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 12:01, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 12:01, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: I found some extensive coverage on "Mediálne" and Živé, though I have no idea whether these resources are reliable. Even if they are, I'm not sure whether regional notability should count. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 12:01, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 05:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 01:54, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.